The Impact of Different Determination of Intangible Fixed Assets in Accordance with CAS and IPSAS on Financial Statements

Dvořák, Martin; Poutník, Lukáš

doi:10.18267/j.efaj.190

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The case study results indicate that IPSAS 17 was not used for increasing transparency in accounting or reducing corruption, which was attributed to an ineffective governmental institution and a weak regulatory framework. Dvorák and Poutník (2017) focused on Czech accounting standards (CAS) and analyzed whether the transition of financial reporting from CAS to IPSASs has influenced the financial situations of public sector entities in the context of intangible fixed assets. The findings indicate that IPSAS 31 and CAS do not correspond or have only partial correspondence.…”

Section: Results Of the Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs): A systematic literature review and future research agenda

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) aims at harmonizing public sector accounting at an international level. IPSASs are intended to generate more comparable financial information across national boundaries and minimize differences in countries’ generally accepted domestic accounting principles. Despite the various advantages of adopting IPSASs, the new accounting standards have been accompanied by critiques in terms of implementation costs, lack of pressure, and alignment with public sector specialties. In addition, many countries have refused to adapt their governmental accounting systems to IPSASs. In the last two decades, a plethora of studies has investigated the evolution of an internationally comparable accrual‐based accounting system. This article provides a systematic review of this research. First, it identifies existing knowledge of research on IPSASs, resulting in a sample of 80 journal articles. Second, it structures research on IPSASs with an empirical focus in three main research areas: (a) antecedents of IPSAS adoption; (b) implementation of accrual accounting based on IPSASs; and (c) outcomes of IPSAS adoption. Third, it discusses the shortcomings and gaps in the existing research and develops an agenda for future research.

show abstract

Section: Results Of the Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%