The Impact of Different Visual Feedbacks in User Training on Motor Imagery Control in BCI

Abstract

The challenges of research into brain–computer interfaces (BCI) include significant individual differences in learning pace and in the effective operation of BCI devices. The use of neurofeedback training is a popular method of improving the effectiveness BCI operation. The purpose of the present study was to determine to what extent it is possible to improve the effectiveness of operation of sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interfaces (SMR-BCI) by supplementing user training with elements modifying the characteristics of visual feedback. Four experimental groups had training designed to reinforce BCI control by: visual feedback in the form of dummy faces expressing emotions (Group 1); flashing the principal elements of visual feedback (Group 2) and giving both visual feedbacks in one condition (Group 3). The fourth group participated in training with no modifications (Group 4). Training consisted of a series of trials where the subjects directed a ball into a basket located to the right or left side of the screen. In Group 1 a schematic image a face, placed on the controlled object, showed various emotions, depending on the accuracy of control. In Group 2, the cue and targets were flashed with different frequency (4 Hz) than the remaining elements visible on the monitor. Both modifications were also used simultaneously in Group 3. SMR activity during the task was recorded before and after the training. In Group 3 there was a significant improvement in SMR control, compared to subjects in Group 2 and 4 (control). Differences between subjects in Groups 1, 2 and 4 (control) were insignificant. This means that relatively small changes in the training procedure may significantly impact the effectiveness of BCI control. Analysis of behavioural data acquired from all participants at training showed greater effectiveness in directing the object towards the right side of the screen. Subjects with the greatest improvement in SMR control showed a significantly lower difference in the accuracy of rightward and leftward movement than others.

Acoustic Neurofeedback Increases Beta ERD During Mental Rotation Task

“…Given the disparities in the related evidence, this aspect should be investigated in controlled studies in the future. Attempts to explain the late effect observed in the motor areas should take into account the evidence suggesting that beta-band desynchronisation is associated with real or imagined movement and in particular with motor planning (Alegre et al 2003; Kaiser et al 2001; Kilner et al 2005; Klostermann et al 2007; Tzagarakis et al 2010; Zapała et al 2018). At the final stage before responding, the participant compares the objects and chooses the answer, preparing to press the appropriate key.…”

Existence of Initial Dip for BCI: An Illusion or Reality

“…Finally, the output of a classifier is feedbacked to help the participants/patients to exercise voluntary self-regulation on the specific brain area. The feedback can be presented in the form of visual ( deCharms et al, 2004 ; Chiew et al, 2012 ; Sitaram et al, 2012 ; Veit et al, 2012 ; Zapaa et al, 2018 ), auditory ( Posse et al, 2003 ; Yoo et al, 2006 ), and virtual reality ( Lorenzetti et al, 2018 ).…”

Brain–Computer Interfaces in Neurorecovery and Neurorehabilitation

“…Critically, sensory feedback is provided to the user, traditionally in the form of visual feedback. 45,46 Auditory 47 and haptic feedback approaches 48,49 are also being explored. 53 or of EEG and fMRI.…”