2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2015.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of domestic regulations on international trade in services: Evidence from firm-level data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the OECD PMR mainly targets domestic regulation which is de jure non-discriminatory (i.e. the restrictions are applied by Belgium to all firms regardless of the origin country), it represents de facto a serious obstacle to cross-border trade (Crozet et al, 2016). This is because domestic regulation is usually designed with domestic suppliers in mind.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the OECD PMR mainly targets domestic regulation which is de jure non-discriminatory (i.e. the restrictions are applied by Belgium to all firms regardless of the origin country), it represents de facto a serious obstacle to cross-border trade (Crozet et al, 2016). This is because domestic regulation is usually designed with domestic suppliers in mind.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers (e.g. Crozet et al (2016)) have used the OECD PMR index as a measure of service trade barriers for the same reasons. Now, while the PMR index varies across sectors and over time, it does not vary across the origin countries from which Belgium imports.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already noted, domestic reforms as captured by the EBRD indicators include trade policy aspects. Moreover, for many services sectors, domestic regulatory restrictions represent de facto trade restrictions (Crozet, Milet, & Mirza, ). For these reasons, we can expect strong similarity between the services policy changes that are the focus of our analysis and investigations that focus on the effects of liberalisation of tariffs on intermediate good imports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loayza, Oviedo, and Servén (2005a,b) find a positive and statistically significant correlation between informality on the one hand, and a broader product market index combining density of regulation pertaining to labor, entry, trade, financial markets, bankruptcy, and contract enforcement on the other. Moreover, a number of studies have shown the relationship between regulation and corruption (see overview in Madani and Licetti (2010)), technology adaptation in firms (Riordan 1992), foreign direct investment (Busse and Groizard 2008), international trade (Crozet and Mirza 2016), innovation (Marcos and Santaló 2010), productivity (Crafts 2006), and employment (Noe 2011).…”
Section: Assist Sectoral Regulators In Developing a Culture And Specimentioning
confidence: 99%