2014
DOI: 10.1177/000203971404900303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Drug Trafficking on Informal Security Actors in Kenya

Abstract: The Kenyan state is currently under pressure from two sides: First, numerous non-state armed groups have taken over the provision of security in areas where the state is practically absent. Second, drug-trafficking organizations are gaining ground as the country is increasingly being used as a major transit hub for narcotics. This article investigates the relationship between drug trafficking and informal security provision in Kenya and draws analogies from comparable experiences in Latin America and West Afri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, nyumba kumi was often implemented in neighborhoods that already hosted other forms of civic policing. In addition to the state-led local peace committees and community policing programs (see Diphoorn and van Stapele 2021;Kioko 2017;Ruteere and Pommerolle 2003;Ruteere 2017;Skilling 2016), there were also a range of civic-led actors that somehow operated under the banner of safety and secu-rity, including gangs, vigilantes, (Agade 2018;Anderson 2002;Chulek 2019;Mutahi 2011;Schuberth 2014), and more notorious players, such as mũngĩkĩ (see Rasmussen 2010). In chapter 4, various contributions underline the complex configurations and relationships that exist across this pluralized security landscape, ranging from collaboration to competition to outright terror.…”
Section: Policing the Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, nyumba kumi was often implemented in neighborhoods that already hosted other forms of civic policing. In addition to the state-led local peace committees and community policing programs (see Diphoorn and van Stapele 2021;Kioko 2017;Ruteere and Pommerolle 2003;Ruteere 2017;Skilling 2016), there were also a range of civic-led actors that somehow operated under the banner of safety and secu-rity, including gangs, vigilantes, (Agade 2018;Anderson 2002;Chulek 2019;Mutahi 2011;Schuberth 2014), and more notorious players, such as mũngĩkĩ (see Rasmussen 2010). In chapter 4, various contributions underline the complex configurations and relationships that exist across this pluralized security landscape, ranging from collaboration to competition to outright terror.…”
Section: Policing the Citymentioning
confidence: 99%