The impact of “Dysconscious Racism”

Jackson, Francesina R.

doi:10.1080/15210969909539924

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This framework begins with the exclusion of Indigenous perspectives that results in a subsequent erasure where there is no information about Indigenous peoples at all. We see this as the dysconscious (Anderson et al, 2019;Jackson, 1999;King, 1991) removal of Indigenous presence which is unfortunately business as usual and exemplified by most of the curriculum and pedagogy we have been exposed to.…”

Section: Epistemological Pluralism From Two Indigenous Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Considering Indigenous Research Methodologies: Bicultural Accountability and the Protection of Community Held Knowledge

Windchief

Cummins

2021

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As part of a continuing conversation related to Indigenous methodologies in Western academic contexts, this manuscript includes a summary of the scholarly dialogue by providing background information and situatedness to an exchange that is positioned in the academy and Indigenous community simultaneously. The dialogue thus far includes a keynote presentation and a series of manuscripts that collectively help explain Indigenous research methodologies (IRMs) and delineates important considerations for practitioners and communities who relate to Indigenous research. The authors share where they agree, and where they diverge as well as their rationale for continuing the discourse in an academic forum. The paper concludes with an alternative method for dissemination (a winter count), that reimagines epistemological pluralism and knowledge protection through bicultural accountability. We consider the repatriation of Indigenous knowledge to be paramount in this process.

show abstract

Section: Epistemological Pluralism From Two Indigenous Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%