2016
DOI: 10.1111/jce.12993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Sinus Rhythm After Cardioversion on Outcomes After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract: Elevated LAP after cardioversion is associated with poor outcome after CA of AF. Sustained pressure overload of the LA in SR could be a cause of the recurrent AF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were not contradictory, when the above‐mentioned residual arrhythmogenic triggers/substrates were considered in those experiencing EPRs. In the patients with EPRs after the 2nd session, which might be associated with the residual triggers/substrates, a high E/E′ ratio indicative of a high left atrial pressure could predict the long‐term arrhythmia recurrences after the blanking period, as an invasively measured left atrial pressure is reported to be an independent predictor of recurrence after AF ablation . On the other hand, the elimination of the triggers/substrates by the RFCA would have prevented the AF/AT recurrences regardless of the E/E′ ratio, and thus the E/E′ ratio was not a predictor of LPRs in the entire study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were not contradictory, when the above‐mentioned residual arrhythmogenic triggers/substrates were considered in those experiencing EPRs. In the patients with EPRs after the 2nd session, which might be associated with the residual triggers/substrates, a high E/E′ ratio indicative of a high left atrial pressure could predict the long‐term arrhythmia recurrences after the blanking period, as an invasively measured left atrial pressure is reported to be an independent predictor of recurrence after AF ablation . On the other hand, the elimination of the triggers/substrates by the RFCA would have prevented the AF/AT recurrences regardless of the E/E′ ratio, and thus the E/E′ ratio was not a predictor of LPRs in the entire study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the patients with EPRs after the 2nd session, which might be associated with the residual triggers/substrates, a high E/E ratio indicative of a high left atrial pressure could predict the long-term arrhythmia recurrences after the blanking period, as an invasively measured left atrial pressure is reported to be an independent predictor of recurrence after AF ablation. 25 On the other hand, the elimination of the triggers/substrates by the RFCA would have prevented the AF/AT recurrences regardless of the E/E ratio, and thus the E/E ratio was not a predictor of LPRs in the entire study cohort. We presumed that the predominant mechanism of the blanking period phenomenon after the 2nd RFCA would have been related to the residual arrhythmogenic triggers/substrates with a lower left atrial pressure, which did not stimulate the triggers/substrates in the late period after the ablation.…”
Section: Presumed Mechanism For the Blanking Period Phenomenon After mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The reduction in chamber distensibility following catheter ablation causes LA pressures to increase disproportionately as the chamber fills with pulmonary venous blood, even though sinus rhythm is restored. Post-ablation increases in LA pressures are seen in up to 40% of unselected patients 29 ; such increases presage a high rate of recurrence of AF during follow-up 30 , 31 …”
Section: Consequences Of the Ablation-related Impairment Of Left Atrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al showed elevated peak LA pressure to be closely associated with electroanatomic remodeling of the left atrium and to be an independent predictor for AF recurrence after PVI 19) . In addition, Kishima et al calculated the difference between mean LA pressure during SR and mean LA pressure during AF (LAPSR-AF) and showed association between a great difference (LAPSR-AF ≥ 0 mmHg) and a poor outcome after PVI 20) .…”
Section: La Pressure and Recurrence Of Afmentioning
confidence: 99%