1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(98)00522-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of ELMs on the ITER divertor

Abstract: Portions of this document may be illegible electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
121
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most likely reason for this is that type I ELMs have larger footprints than type III ELMs at the divertor [25] and therefore if the ELM moves past the divertor RFEA then signal will be seen for a longer time. As has already been shown, each type I ELM measured has a different current structure measurement which appears to be several filaments moving past the probe radially.…”
Section: Fst Type I Elm Ti Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most likely reason for this is that type I ELMs have larger footprints than type III ELMs at the divertor [25] and therefore if the ELM moves past the divertor RFEA then signal will be seen for a longer time. As has already been shown, each type I ELM measured has a different current structure measurement which appears to be several filaments moving past the probe radially.…”
Section: Fst Type I Elm Ti Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In type I edge localize modes (ELMS), a sudden collapse of the pressure gradient caused by rmicroinstability-driven turbulence leads to strong power loss across the separatrix of 2 6% of the total plasma stored energy with up to 80% being deposited on the divertor PFCs between 0.1-1 ms [16]. Plasma disruptions are another important transient event.…”
Section: Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of IR, LP and TC time-averaged heat flux profiles for a typical ELMy H-mode on JET is shown in Fig.4.2.1-1. Profiles are usually time-averaged in ELMy H-mode (in part because few diagnostics have the necessary time resolution to distinguish ELMs) but observations from fast diagnostics indicate that ELMs either do not significantly modify the inter-ELM profile (outer divertor) [14,15,16] or dominate it (typical of the inner divertor) [2,8]. The outer target receives the majority of the divertor heat load, concentrated in a narrower profile than at the inner target (typical out:in power asymmetry ~ 2.5:1 and out:in peak heat flux asymmetry ~ 5:1) [17].…”
Section: Steady State Divertor Power Deposition Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies of ELM energy losses [15] concluded that, in order to compare ELM size across devices and configurations and to project to future tokamaks, the energy lost at an ELM should be normalised to an estimate of the bulk plasma energy which is potentially accessible to expulsion by ELMs. This is usually characterised by the pedestal plasma energy, which is the total pedestal pressure, ions plus electrons, times the plasma volume [15].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Type I Elm Energy Transport To Pfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation