The Impact of Employees’ Perceptions of Strategic Alignment on Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation of Korean Firms

Abstract

Despite the increasing amount of research on the use of strategic alignment to ensure sustainability, Korean companies have been found to lack an understanding of the initiative that connects strategic alignment and organizational performance. We argue the need for role clarity and employee engagement as two motivational mechanisms for strategic alignment to achieve better organizational performance. The research model uses variables related to strategic alignment, role clarity (goal and process clarity), employee engagement, and organizational performance. The model was tested by surveying 244 participants in 74 Korean companies. The results of the structural model tested using the partial least squares regression reveal that strategic alignment is indirectly related to organizational performance through goal clarity and employee engagement. This study also clarifies the motivation of strategic alignment in terms of individuals (e.g., psychological stability of individual goals and actions) and organizations (e.g., high level of engagement toward the organization’s active support). Further research issues are also discussed.

Strategic alignment dimensions and structured practices of learning organizations: A case study of Wasit university

“…1. The efficient alignment of strategies is critical to organizational success and prosperity [28][29][30]. Linking the vision to the organization ensures compatibility by associating the organization's strategy with the guidelines and policies of information technology.…”

“…Figure 1. Dimensions of strategic alignment.Source: Dairo, et al[29]; Kim, et al[30]; Gonyora, et al[32]; Kindermann, et al[33] and Isal, et al[40].…”

Polarity Based Model for Guiding Medical School Strategy During Crisis – A Cross Sectional Qualitative Study

“…40 Kim et al provided evidence regarding the effect of the strategic alignment in the form of clarity of goals and process and their significantly positive relationship with employee's engagement and in turn the organization's performance and sustainability. 41 Another study proposes that organizations should possess insightful vision and mission statements for achieving strategic goals. 30…”

Digital Transformation: Environmental Friend or Foe? Panel Discussion at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2019

“…The traditional decision makers now have the added responsibility of being 'environmentally sensible' to take leadership of attaining sustainability goals (Joshi et al 2003;Kim et al 2020). Due to constant pressures received from customers (Lieb and Lieb 2010), environmental groups (McKinnon 2010a), public policies (McKinnon 2010b) and global mandates (Turnhout et al 2016), organizations are compelled to adhere to environmentally sustainable business operations, without compromising the profitability and efficiency of the organization.…”

“…However, it was noted that such retrospective thinking in decision making rarely favors environmental sustainability. Especially, the middle level and line-of-business managers are less likely to initiate environmental sustainability programs at the expense of compromising efficiency and profitability (Kim et al 2020). For environmentally sustainable projects to be effective, such directives and support must come from the executive level managers (de Medeiros et al 2014) incorporating assurances, support, incentives into the organizational policy and procedures (Molla and Abareshi 2012).…”