Indigenous Pathways, Transitions and Participation in Higher Education 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4062-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Enabling Programs on Indigenous Participation, Success and Retention in Australian Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, increases in Indigenous student enrolments do not correspond directly to graduation rates, and thus do not accurately represent academic achievement (see Nakata, 2013). Furthermore, although Indigenous student participation in enabling programmes is fundamental to improving undergraduate entrance rates, the completion of these courses is also not considered to be a reliable indicator of success (Behrendt et al, 2012) and there are discrepancies in reports of how many undergraduate Indigenous students have actually accessed these programmes (DET data suggest that only 9.4% of Indigenous students between 2009 and 2013 had completed an enabling course; Pitman et al (2017), whereas the Review suggested that over 50% of Indigenous students had accessed undergraduate degrees through enabling or special entry programmes). Thus, other ways to measure student success that reflected students' ongoing participation and progression through their undergraduate degrees were sought.…”
Section: Measuring Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, increases in Indigenous student enrolments do not correspond directly to graduation rates, and thus do not accurately represent academic achievement (see Nakata, 2013). Furthermore, although Indigenous student participation in enabling programmes is fundamental to improving undergraduate entrance rates, the completion of these courses is also not considered to be a reliable indicator of success (Behrendt et al, 2012) and there are discrepancies in reports of how many undergraduate Indigenous students have actually accessed these programmes (DET data suggest that only 9.4% of Indigenous students between 2009 and 2013 had completed an enabling course; Pitman et al (2017), whereas the Review suggested that over 50% of Indigenous students had accessed undergraduate degrees through enabling or special entry programmes). Thus, other ways to measure student success that reflected students' ongoing participation and progression through their undergraduate degrees were sought.…”
Section: Measuring Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the goal was to match (or better) the retention rates for non-Indigenous domestic students by 2017, based on baseline data showing that, in the 3 years before the implementation of the strategy (2010-2013), the average retention rate for Indigenous students was 12% below that of non-Indigenous students (Indigenous = 71.5%; non-Indigenous = 80.9%). Unit success rates were calculated using the method described by Pitman et al (2017) where success is expressed as the proportion of units in which students receive a 'pass' (or above) grade, divided by the total number of units attempted. The Centre set a target that 70% of all units undertaken by Indigenous students would result in a 'pass' (or above) grade by 2017.…”
Section: Measuring Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Pitman et al (2017), a correlation was identified between enabling programs and retention, which was ascribed to their focus on building resilience. Although enabling programs built student confidence, it was unclear "whether the academic scaffolding provided in these programs is preparing students to successfully complete their undergraduate subjects and progress in their studies in a timely manner" (Pitman et al, 2017, p. 246).…”
Section: Theme 9: Knowledge and Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other estimates have noted that 70 percent of indigenous students gain entry to higher education through special entry programs, and that 50 percent of aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students who gained entry to university did so through special entry programs. The findings of a study on the impact of enabling programs for indigenous students suggest further investment in these programs, demonstrating a link between participation in these programs and subsequent participation and retention in higher education programs--though long-term academic success measures for these students warrant further study (Pitman et al 2017).…”
Section: Increasing Access To Foundational Education Programs Throughmentioning
confidence: 99%