2022
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03748-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of environmental factors on the evolution of brain size in carnivorans

Abstract: The reasons why some animals have developed larger brains has long been a subject of debate. Yet, it remains unclear which selective pressures may favour the encephalization and how it may act during evolution at different taxonomic scales. Here we studied the patterns and tempo of brain evolution within the order Carnivora and present large-scale comparative analysis of the effect of ecological, environmental, social, and physiological variables on relative brain size in a sample of 174 extant carnivoran spec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to exploring the bivariate relationships between NF and morphological characteristics, we also explored the relationship between NF and published average species behavioral and ecological characteristics. Species behavioral and ecological data (i.e., social complexity, behavioral complexity, dexterity score, species average group size, home range, geographic range) were sourced from species averages [4,39]. The relationship between NF and continuous data (obtained from published sources) was compared using correlation coefficients (Pearson).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to exploring the bivariate relationships between NF and morphological characteristics, we also explored the relationship between NF and published average species behavioral and ecological characteristics. Species behavioral and ecological data (i.e., social complexity, behavioral complexity, dexterity score, species average group size, home range, geographic range) were sourced from species averages [4,39]. The relationship between NF and continuous data (obtained from published sources) was compared using correlation coefficients (Pearson).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species were split into two groups (social and solitary) as defined by Benson-Amram et al [4] before testing for significant differences in group means. Similarly, species were split into diel groups (diurnal, nocturnal, and cathemeral-crepuscular) as coded by Michaud, Toussaint, and Gilissen [39] before significance testing. Based on the functions of the prefrontal cortex in planning, reasoning, and long-term memory in mammals [40], we predicted that prefrontal cortex NF would be correlated with social complexity, behavioral diversity, and species average group size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for the individual when adapting to new environments [72]. An increasing number of studies have come to focus on the relative volumes of different regions of the brain [61,62,65,[73][74][75][76][77] and have found correlations that were missed when looking at whole brain size.…”
Section: (Iii) Brain Endocastmentioning
confidence: 99%