The impact of environmental recall and carbon taxation on the carbon footprint of supermarket shopping

Abstract

This study uses an incentive-compatible experimental online supermarket to assess whether prior environmentally-friendly behaviour outside the store, and whether carbon taxes motivate sustainable consumption. Previous research suggests that past decisions may influence current decisions, for example because consumers compensate morally desirable and undesirable acts (e.g. high-carbon food baskets may follow past environmentally-friendly behaviours) over time; while carbon taxes have been promoted as effective tools to reduce the carbon footprint of food baskets, despite limited empirical evidence. After controlling for past consumption, results show that being required to recall past environmentally-friendly behaviour before shopping led consumers to purchase more sustainable food baskets. Carbon taxation also strongly reduces the carbon footprint of food baskets, showing no interaction with the recall of past behaviours.

COVID-19 Vaccine Passport and International Traveling: The Combined Effect of Two Nudges on Americans’ Support for the Pass

“…A related nascent area of literature has attempted to identify the relationship between price incentives and nudges [43]. The handful of works carried out in this domain have produced conflicting evidence [45][46][47]. A recent survey on the issue concluded that, due to the very small number of works on this area, "our understanding ... is limited, as studies rarely use an approach that allows properly assessing synergy or the causes and mechanisms of it" [43].…”

Do virtual reality experiments replicate projection bias phenomena? Examining the external validity of a virtual supermarket

“…We use financial incentives to increase the realism of virtual shopping settings following other studies by Demarque et al, (2015), Muller et al, (2019) and Panzone et al, (2018), who used real incentives to increase the realism of online shopping scenarios. The advantage of using economic incentives in experimental economics is that they mitigate hypothetical bias (Lusk & Shogren, 2007).…”

Making the carbon basket count: Goal setting promotes sustainable consumption in a simulated online supermarket

“…According to Hertwich and Peters (2009), about half of the non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gases such as methane are caused from food production. Given that dietary choices can have a significant impact on the greenhouse gases which have been implicated in global warming, interest is growing in how consumers can be encouraged to reduce their carbon footprint when grocery shopping (e.g., Panzone, Ulph, Zizzo, Hilton, & Clear, 2018).…”