The impact of ethnic minority status on tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment delays in Hunan Province, China

Abstract

Background Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a major public health challenge in China. Understanding TB management delays within the context of China’s unique ethnic diversity may be of value in tackling the disease. This study sought to evaluate the impact of ethnic minority status on TB diagnosis and treatment delays. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with TB in Hunan Province, China between 2013 and 2018. Diagnosis delay was defined as the time interval between the onset of symptoms and the date of diagnosis. Treatment delay was defined as the time interval between diagnosis and treatment commencement. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with TB diagnosis and treatment delay, including ethnic minority status. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the strength of association between the dependant and independent variables. Results A total of 318,792 TB patients were included in the study with a mean age of 51.7 years (SD 17.7). The majority of patients were male (72.6%) and Han ethnicity (90.6%). The odds of experiencing diagnosis delay (> 21 days) were significantly higher for Tujia (AOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.41, 1.51), Miao (AOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.26, 1.37), Dong (AOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.85, 2.11), Yao (AOR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.37), and Bai (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.74) ethnic minorities compared to the Han majority. The odds of experiencing treatment delay (> 15 days) were significantly lower for five of the seven ethnic minority groups relative to the Han majority: Tujia (AOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88, 0.96), Miao (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70, 0.79), Dong (AOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81, 0.95), Yao (AOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.17, 0.24) and ‘other’ (ethnic minorities that individually represented < 0.1% of the patient population) (AOR 0.70, 955 CI 0.51, 0.97). Conclusions This study shows ethnic minority status to be a significant risk factor in diagnosis delay, but for it to reduce the odds of treatment delay. Further research is required to determine the underlying causes of diagnosis delay within ethnic minority populations.

Potential for England’s statutory school entry assessment to identify special educational needs and reveal structural inequalities: a population-based study

“…This is in line with previous research which has found ethnic biases in smaller samples 20–22. More broadly, this adds to a growing body of literature indicating that individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds are identified later than their ethnic majority counterparts in conditions as diverse as autism,28 tuberculosis29 and cancer 30. Importantly, however, there were no ethnic differences in children who entered formal education ‘school ready’, thus indicating that the association between ethnicity and SEN is not universal.…”

Assessing intersectional gender analysis in Nepal’s health management information system: a case study on tuberculosis for inclusive health systems

“…Our study did not identify significant differences in TB-related outcomes across ethnic groups. However, various studies conducted in other countries have shown that the migrant population and ethnic minorities have a higher prevalence of TB in comparison to the general population [ 49 – 53 ]. This could be because of interactions between cultural and structural barriers to accessing healthcare [ 3 , 4 , 50 – 53 ].…”

Toward tuberculosis elimination by understanding epidemiologic characteristics and risk factors in Hainan Province, China

“…Among different occupational groups, students had lower duration of patient delay, likely because they have easier access to relevant health education and medical resources, enabling them to seek diagnosis and treatment earlier [ 34 ]. Additionally, the delay in seeking medical attention was lower among the Han ethnic group compared to minority ethnic groups like the Li people, possibly due to cultural differences between different ethnic groups, unequal distribution of medical resources, and varying levels of awareness of TB [ 35 , 36 ].…”