Abstract:This paper uses the quasi‐experimental setting of the 2004 EU enlargement, as well as town‐level data along the affected German border, to estimate the effect of economic integration on border town population development. Using a difference‐in‐differences approach, we find that the accession has had a significant positive effect on the rate of population change after 2004. However, this does not offset the, generally, poorer population development of border towns compared to interior towns. Moreover, the integ… Show more
“…The empirical findings of Niebuhr (2004) and Petrakos and Topaloglou (2008) also supported the idea that Europe's more central border regions benefit more from macro-integration in comparison with its external border regions (bordering non-EU countries). More recently, Brakman et al (2012) and Heider (2019) also confirmed the spatial heterogeneity of integration effects on population growth. Brakman et al (2012) found a positive effect of EU enlargement along Europe's integrating borders, particularly for large regions and cities that are located within a 70 km range from national borders.…”
Section: Bordering Cbc and Regional Growthmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This paper argues that CBC is one main channel of such an impact, and moves on to test the significance of this impact by using INTERREG-funded CBC projects data from the EC's 2007-13 programming cycle. In doing that, it also makes use of panel data on regional gross value added (GVA) per capita, which is a more robust indicator of economic development compared with population as used in previous similar studies (Brakman et al, 2012;Heider, 2019).…”
“…The empirical findings of Niebuhr (2004) and Petrakos and Topaloglou (2008) also supported the idea that Europe's more central border regions benefit more from macro-integration in comparison with its external border regions (bordering non-EU countries). More recently, Brakman et al (2012) and Heider (2019) also confirmed the spatial heterogeneity of integration effects on population growth. Brakman et al (2012) found a positive effect of EU enlargement along Europe's integrating borders, particularly for large regions and cities that are located within a 70 km range from national borders.…”
Section: Bordering Cbc and Regional Growthmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This paper argues that CBC is one main channel of such an impact, and moves on to test the significance of this impact by using INTERREG-funded CBC projects data from the EC's 2007-13 programming cycle. In doing that, it also makes use of panel data on regional gross value added (GVA) per capita, which is a more robust indicator of economic development compared with population as used in previous similar studies (Brakman et al, 2012;Heider, 2019).…”
“…However, conclusions drawn from empirical data describing Polish-German border regions are not congruent. Data on population changes suggest that the positive effect is only relevant for large towns, especially German cities specialising in services, but not for Polish municipalities (Heider 2018). Some analyses of the spatial distribution of the FDI inflow (at the beginning of the process) and accumulated value (in successive years of European integration) indicate that it has had a linear dependence on Polish-German border -the closer to the border the higher the investment attractiveness.…”
The aim of this study was to investigate the dynamics of local development in the Polish-German borderland in the process of European integration. Taking the perspective of the economically weaker partner (Poland) and its inner market, fiscal and socio-economic indicators were used to depict both spatial and time dimension of the phenomenon. The analysis showed that the dynamics of local economy, foreign investment and labour market have been changing with the advancement of debordering process and had a non-linear character. Furthermore, the legal barriers earlier imposed by the state border were replaced by other limitations for the new common market – more socio-economic in nature. As a result the immediate neighbourhood of the border was the first beneficiary of the European integration initiated in the nineties and the first to experience its drawbacks.
“…Although we estimated a positive coefficient of the western border dummy on the migration rates of EU15 citizens, we did not find a similar effect regarding the migration of Eastern Europeans. This might be attributed to the fact that many of Germany's eastern border regions are among the structurally weakest in the whole country and partially suffer from drastic population decline (Heider, 2019a). Some of the western border regions, on the other hand, have achieved high levels of economic development due to long‐lasting cross‐border economic interaction (Topaloglou, Kallioras, Manetos, & Petrakos, 2005).…”
Section: Regional Determinants Of Foreign Migrationmentioning
We examine the impact of foreign migration on regional disparities in population development in Germany by analysing spatial patterns and determinants at the county level for the period of 2007-2017. Counterfactual analyses show that international migration has been the major component of population growth across German regions. However, immigration has mainly been directed towards large cities and highly urbanised areas and has therefore reinforced the existing spatial disparities in population development. Spatial econometric models nonetheless reveal that international migrants are not attracted by agglomeration per se. The location choices of international migrants were mainly driven by existing regional ethnic networks and factors that are related to different personal life stages, such as education or changes in family status. Furthermore, the estimated regional determinants vary strongly across migrant groups from different geographical backgrounds as well as between the external and internal migration of foreigners.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.