2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-1027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Exposure to Other Countries on Life Satisfaction: An International Application of the Relative Income Hypothesis

Abstract: The cause of international differences in life satisfaction is usually ascribed to differences in living standards. Yet, despite improving living standards in a lot of middleincome countries, significant differences in life satisfaction between middle-and highincome countries remain. This paper examines if there is an international comparison effect and assesses to what extent the relative income hypothesis can be applied to explain international differences in life satisfaction. We test this by analyzing how … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Nonetheless, and most importantly from our perspective, these studies do not account for globalization nor for any interaction effects of income inequality and globalization in subjective wellbeing. Schalembier (2016) identifies measures of comparative performance vis-à-vis other countries to become more important for subjective well-being as international exposure increases. He thus explores interaction effects between income inequality and globalization (or international exposure for that matter), but considering crossnational comparisons rather than within-country income distributions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Nonetheless, and most importantly from our perspective, these studies do not account for globalization nor for any interaction effects of income inequality and globalization in subjective wellbeing. Schalembier (2016) identifies measures of comparative performance vis-à-vis other countries to become more important for subjective well-being as international exposure increases. He thus explores interaction effects between income inequality and globalization (or international exposure for that matter), but considering crossnational comparisons rather than within-country income distributions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On dealing with macro-and micro-data by means of a multi-level, cross-country, analysis with reference to subjective well-being, see, e.g.,Schyns (2002),Schalembier (2016) orGarcía-Muñoz et al (2019). 9 Another (alternative) method that might suggest itself is a partial least squares (PLS) approach as introduced into statistical modeling byWold (1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, hard-core evidence on the relationships between the two phenomena, globalization and human values, is only beginning to emerge. In the largest database of journal literature in the world, Scopus, 2 there are just two titles which directly combine the catch-words “ KOF-Index ” and “ World Values Survey , ” Heggem and Jakobsen ( 2016 ) and Schalembier ( 2016 ). But both studies do not reveal us any further clues about the dramatic scenarios, described by Barber ( 1992 ) and Castells ( 2011 ).…”
Section: Background: Combining Globalization Research and Global Valumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results imply that globalization increases the level of subjective wellbeing. Schalembier (2016) analyzes the impact of exposure to other countries on life satisfaction of individuals. Exposure measure is derived from the KOF globalization index.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%