2015
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Fiscal Crisis on Decision‐Making Processes in European Governments: Dynamics of a Centralization Cascade

Abstract: Th e Great Recession resulted in fi scal crises for governments across the Western world. Signifi cant cuts in government programs were initiated as many governments scrambled to reduce their growing budget defi cits. Th is article explores how European governments reacted during the recent crisis. In particular, the authors focus on the interlinkages between shifts toward more centralized decision making. Th e article uses a survey of thousands of public sector executives in 17 European countries. Th e author… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to a crisis, it is easier for policy actors to discredit the status quo, argue for change and overcome resistance (Keeler, ; Kingdon, ; Schmidt, ). It is also argued that the deeper the crisis – that is, the more severe the fiscal pressures in a country – the bigger the opportunity for comprehensive reforms (Keeler, ; Raudla et al, ) and the stronger the incentives of the policy makers to undertake institutional changes to prevent its recurrence (Keeler, ). In light of those arguments, we would expect that countries that have experienced more dramatic crises are likely to have experienced more extensive changes in their budget processes than those for whom the experience of crisis was milder.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to a crisis, it is easier for policy actors to discredit the status quo, argue for change and overcome resistance (Keeler, ; Kingdon, ; Schmidt, ). It is also argued that the deeper the crisis – that is, the more severe the fiscal pressures in a country – the bigger the opportunity for comprehensive reforms (Keeler, ; Raudla et al, ) and the stronger the incentives of the policy makers to undertake institutional changes to prevent its recurrence (Keeler, ). In light of those arguments, we would expect that countries that have experienced more dramatic crises are likely to have experienced more extensive changes in their budget processes than those for whom the experience of crisis was milder.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, public organizations across the globe have been put under stress by increasingly demanding work environments. This trend is driven by the concurrence of austerity measures and greater citizen demands for quality public services (Karanikolos et al ; Raudla et al ). In other words, since the Great Recession, public employees have been asked to do more with less.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in the power of Ministries of Finance has also been an overarching aspect of centralisation across Europe (Raudla et al, 2015). This trend is evident even in countries such as Sweden or Norway, which had not been severely affected by the crisis (Randma-Liiv and Savi, 2016).…”
Section: Centralisationmentioning
confidence: 99%