2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1643-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of fish oil and wheat germ oil combination on mineral-bone and inflammatory markers in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Abstract: FO plus WGO supplementation showed beneficial effect on serum Ca levels of HD patients without any statistically significant effect on other mineral-bone and inflammatory markers. Further investigations are required to confirm it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the eligibility section, six articles were eliminated that did not evaluate whether the studies were non-randomized trials or described a diseased population (Haripriya and Premakumari, 2010 ; Zakaria et al, 2017 ). One study was also removed that did not report the functionality of wheat germ related to metabolic markers (Kobyliak et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the eligibility section, six articles were eliminated that did not evaluate whether the studies were non-randomized trials or described a diseased population (Haripriya and Premakumari, 2010 ; Zakaria et al, 2017 ). One study was also removed that did not report the functionality of wheat germ related to metabolic markers (Kobyliak et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six trials provided data on hs-CRP among the five treatments ( n = 303) (Figure 2B) [10,11,20,25,28,30]. According to the available data, our network meta-analysis of hs-CRP showed no significant differences among placebo, PUFA, vitamin E, PUFAs plus vitamin E, and MCT (Supplementary File 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then, two systematic reviews and 25 randomized clinical trials without relevant outcomes were excluded [31,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. There were 21 references from 18 RCTs meeting the eligibility criteria (Figure 1) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations