2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03136-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of flipped learning on the relationship between self-regulated online learning and academic procrastination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research with university students highlights the inverse relationship between academic procrastination and selfregulated learning (e.g., Hong et al, 2021;Howell et al, 2006;Senécal et al, 1995;Wolters, 2003), defined as "an active, constructive process whereby learners set goals for their learning and then attempt to monitor, regulate, and control their cognition, motivation, and behavior, guided and constrained by their goals and the contextual features in the environment" (Pintrich, 2000, p. 453). More specifically, the failure to engage in self-regulated learning has traditionally been considered an antecedent of academic procrastination (Schraw et al, 2007;Sirois & Pychyl, 2013) and evidenced in several previous studies (e.g., Ergulec et al, 2022;Zarrin et al, 2020). For example, self-efficacy for learning and selfregulation strategies (e.g., Wolters, 2003), as well as selfefficacy in applying these strategies (Tan et al, 2008), are the self-regulated learning dimensions that show the greatest relationships with academic delays in several studies with university students (Klassen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Academic Procrastination and Self-regulated Learningmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Research with university students highlights the inverse relationship between academic procrastination and selfregulated learning (e.g., Hong et al, 2021;Howell et al, 2006;Senécal et al, 1995;Wolters, 2003), defined as "an active, constructive process whereby learners set goals for their learning and then attempt to monitor, regulate, and control their cognition, motivation, and behavior, guided and constrained by their goals and the contextual features in the environment" (Pintrich, 2000, p. 453). More specifically, the failure to engage in self-regulated learning has traditionally been considered an antecedent of academic procrastination (Schraw et al, 2007;Sirois & Pychyl, 2013) and evidenced in several previous studies (e.g., Ergulec et al, 2022;Zarrin et al, 2020). For example, self-efficacy for learning and selfregulation strategies (e.g., Wolters, 2003), as well as selfefficacy in applying these strategies (Tan et al, 2008), are the self-regulated learning dimensions that show the greatest relationships with academic delays in several studies with university students (Klassen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Academic Procrastination and Self-regulated Learningmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Academic procrastination is a growing concern in the field of education [71,72]. It is recognized as a widespread harmful human behavior [73] that causes students to delay the start of academic tasks, and sometimes a failure to complete them altogether [74]. Research in the field has identified several common characteristics in students who engage in procrastination.…”
Section: Academic Procrastination In Education From Electronic Resour...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to research on academic procrastination among pre-service teachers, self-regulated online learning signi cantly mediates the relationship between learning support and procrastination. Students who engage in self-regulated online learning tend to procrastinate less (Ergulec et al, 2023). Unfortunately, many pre-service teachers struggle with procrastination, which is linked to lower academic performance and a lack of effective strategies for self-control (Martín-Antón et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%