2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of fluorescent dyes on the performances of polystyrene-based plastic scintillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transmission achieved is more than 85% in the spectral range of interest [27]. In addition, PPO and POPOP are a great choice for polystyrene-based plastic scintillators in order to achieve higher intensity and light yield if their concentration is properly tuned for each plastic [28]. Thus, their concentration was optimized to be 1% and 0.03% by weight for PPO and POPOP respectively for the scintillator assumed here [24].…”
Section: Geometry and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmission achieved is more than 85% in the spectral range of interest [27]. In addition, PPO and POPOP are a great choice for polystyrene-based plastic scintillators in order to achieve higher intensity and light yield if their concentration is properly tuned for each plastic [28]. Thus, their concentration was optimized to be 1% and 0.03% by weight for PPO and POPOP respectively for the scintillator assumed here [24].…”
Section: Geometry and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are examples of primary dopants, i.e., 2,5-Diphenyloxazole (PPO), p-Terphenyl (PTP), and 2-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)-5-(4-biphenyl)-1,3,4oxadiazole (b-PBD), while for secondary dopant, i.e., 1,4-bis-[2-(5-Phenyl)oxazolyl]benzene (POPOP), 9,10-Diphenylanthracene (DPA), 1,4-bis(2-Methylstyryl ) benzene (Bis-MSB), and 1,4-Bis(4-methylstyryl)benzene (Me-MSB). Based on the research conducted by Jun Zhu et al [4], from all the primary and secondary dopant types mentioned above, PPO and POPOP were the most efficient additive dopants for polystyrene-based plastic scintillators with mass ratios of 0.2% and 0.02%, respectively. However, the weakness of PS-based plastic scintillator is the efficiency of the plastic scintillator on the scintillation response, which can be decreased on dosimetry with photon energy less than 260 keV [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%