2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of food inflation on urban poverty and its monetary cost: some back‐of‐the‐envelope calculations

Abstract: This article uses a sample of 72 developing countries to estimate the change in the cost of alleviating urban poverty brought about by the recent increase in food prices. This cost is approximated by the change in the poverty deficit (PD), that is, the variation in financial resources required to eliminate poverty under perfect targeting. The results show that, for most countries, the cost represents less than 0.2% of gross domestic product. However, in the most severely affected, it may exceed 3%. In all coun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most analysts agree that a mix of rising oil prices, US dollar ($) depreciation, biofuel policies, market speculation, and temporarily imposed trade restrictions all contributed to the rapid surge in food prices [see Headey and Fan (2008) for a review]. Several cross-country studies also confirm that the net welfare effect of rising food prices on the world's poor has been negative, mainly due to the high share of net food buyers among the poor (Ivanic and Martin, 2008;Dessus et al, 2008;Aksoy and Isik-Dikmelik, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most analysts agree that a mix of rising oil prices, US dollar ($) depreciation, biofuel policies, market speculation, and temporarily imposed trade restrictions all contributed to the rapid surge in food prices [see Headey and Fan (2008) for a review]. Several cross-country studies also confirm that the net welfare effect of rising food prices on the world's poor has been negative, mainly due to the high share of net food buyers among the poor (Ivanic and Martin, 2008;Dessus et al, 2008;Aksoy and Isik-Dikmelik, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These include the rate at which global prices are passed through to local prices, the distribution of net sellers and net buyers of food staples, the specific commodities for which prices increase, the ability of consumers to substitute into other less expensive food items, the coping strategies available to households, and policy responses by governments. The evidence from the 2008 food price spike suggests that in most countries poverty will increase when domestic food prices rise substantially, even in rural areas, because both rural and urban poor are typically net consumers of food (Dessus, Herrera, & de Hoyos, 2008;Ivanic & Martin, 2008;Wodon & Zaman, 2010). There are wide variations in the magnitudes of these impacts, which suggest that a careful analysis of the poverty impact of this more recent price spike is needed in order to inform policy responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…What we do know from the cross-country poverty simulations so far-namely, Ivanic and Martin's (2008) nine-country study, Zezza et al's (2008) 11-country study, Wodon et al's (2008) study of 12 West African countries, and Dessus et al's (2008) study of the urban sector of 73 developing countries-is what the likely impacts on poverty would be, given price changes. In effect, then, these simulations tell us who would be vulnerable to rising prices, but not which populations are actually experiencing hardship as a result of rising food prices, because none of these experiments incorporate actual price changes.…”
Section: Microeconomic Vulnerability To Rising Food Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%