2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2580602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Foreign Banks on Monetary Policy Transmission during the Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009: Evidence from Korea

Abstract: session participants for very useful comments and suggestions, which were provided at the research seminar held at the Bank of Korea, July 2013. ContentsⅠ . Introduction ··············································································· 1 Ⅱ . The related literature ······························································ 2 Ⅲ . Model, data and estimation methodology ·························· 4 1. The model ······················································································… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 This is in line with the literature that claims foreign banks to be a major channel of shock transmission. For example, using a sample of U.S. banks,Cetorelli and Goldberg (2012) find evidence that global banks usually manage liquidity on a global scale, actively using internal capital markets in reallocating funds in response to local shocks, thus contributing to international transmission of liquidity shocks and dampening the effect of domestic monetary policy Jeon et. al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 This is in line with the literature that claims foreign banks to be a major channel of shock transmission. For example, using a sample of U.S. banks,Cetorelli and Goldberg (2012) find evidence that global banks usually manage liquidity on a global scale, actively using internal capital markets in reallocating funds in response to local shocks, thus contributing to international transmission of liquidity shocks and dampening the effect of domestic monetary policy Jeon et. al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in the following subsection, we find that foreign banks respond more strongly to global financial conditions, rather than monetary policy in host countries, compared to domestic banks.27 This is in line with the literature that claims foreign banks to be a major channel of shock transmission. For example, using a sample of U.S. banks,Cetorelli and Goldberg (2012) find evidence that global banks usually manage liquidity on a global scale, actively using internal capital markets in reallocating funds in response to local shocks, thus contributing to international transmission of liquidity shocks and dampening the effect of domestic monetary policy Jeon et. al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%