2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00434.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Press Freedom

Abstract: In our paper we establish foreign direct investment (FDI) as a major determinant of media freedom. Global integration can strengthen the media sector financially, make it technologically enhanced and can also improve the economic environment as a whole. This, in turn, would work towards the enhancement of media freedom. The sample includes high, middle and low income economies. Using a panel of 115 countries over a period of 20 years, our results reveal that FDI is an absolute necessity for a free and efficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The popularity of the index from Freedom House is based on the extensiveness of the data in terms of both countries and time period coverage. It has been used by several cross sectional panel studies on press freedom (see for example, Dutta and Roy, 2009;Sobel et al, 2010;Freille et al, 2007;Chowdhury, 2004;Brunetti and Weder, 2003 to mention a few). The Freedom of Press score is assigned based on twenty three methodology questions that are divided into three categories: the legal environment, the economic environment and the political environment in each country.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of the index from Freedom House is based on the extensiveness of the data in terms of both countries and time period coverage. It has been used by several cross sectional panel studies on press freedom (see for example, Dutta and Roy, 2009;Sobel et al, 2010;Freille et al, 2007;Chowdhury, 2004;Brunetti and Weder, 2003 to mention a few). The Freedom of Press score is assigned based on twenty three methodology questions that are divided into three categories: the legal environment, the economic environment and the political environment in each country.…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spending on patronage fuelled by the abundance of mineral rents may have a similar effect (Auty, 2005;Vandewalle, 1998). Mineral rents concentrated in the hands of authoritarian rulers may also suppress democratic aspirations either in the form of excessive spending in internal security (this is what Michael Ross (2001) coins the 'repression effect'; see also Sandbakken, 2006;Tsui, 2010 andGause, 1995) or obstruction of free information (Dutta and Roy, 2009;Egorov et al, 2009;Williams, 2011). The appropriability of the mineral rents by the rulers in power (which for example might increase when mineral industries are nationalised) naturally mediates the resource-democracy relationship (Ross, 2012;Snyder and Bhavnani, 2005).…”
Section: Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increases in economic productivity cause less stress in the political system, and the decreased political stress contributes to increased press freedom. A commonly-held view is that press freedom is a result of economic prosperity (Dutta & Roy, 2009;Jacobsson & Jacobsson, 2002;Norris & Zinnbauer, 2002) since rich countries can afford a free press (Freille et al, 2007). This rationale comes from nation development theorists' conventional argument that increases in per capita income lead to increases in popular demand for civil liberties (de Mesquita & Downs, 2005, p. 78).…”
Section: Economymentioning
confidence: 95%