2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of fossil calibrations, codon positions and relaxed clocks on the divergence time estimates of the native Australian rodents (Conilurini)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Haplotype 1 has a world-wide distribution, including Antilles, Britain, Europe, French Polynesia, Guadeloupe, Mediterranean Basin, New Guinea, New Zealand, Polynesia, West Africa, and the USA (Robins et al 2007;Nilsson et al 2010;Tollenaere et al 2010;Colangelo et al 2015). It is common in New Zealand, but we did not find it on Stewart Island.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Haplotype 1 has a world-wide distribution, including Antilles, Britain, Europe, French Polynesia, Guadeloupe, Mediterranean Basin, New Guinea, New Zealand, Polynesia, West Africa, and the USA (Robins et al 2007;Nilsson et al 2010;Tollenaere et al 2010;Colangelo et al 2015). It is common in New Zealand, but we did not find it on Stewart Island.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The dating was performed solely by the NPRS-LOG method because previous studies showed virtually no differences relative to other algorithms (Roos et al 2007; Nilsson et al 2010). The numerous calibrating points are marked with circles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitution saturation was reported to negatively influence the estimation of divergence time in deep branches and possibly effect estimated times of shallow nodes (Beaulieu, Oliver, O'meara, & Beaulieu, ; Nilsson et al., ; van Tuinen & Torres, ). The inclusion of COI third codon position led to different estimated ages of the basal nodes in comparison with divergence times predicted previously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%