The impact of government subsidies on build-operate-transfer contract design for charging piles in circular economy

Abstract

PurposeBuild-operate-transfer (BOT) contracts are widely used in the construction and operation of charging piles for new energy vehicles worldwide and stipulate that governments grant charging pile operators franchises for a certain period of time to invest in the construction and operation of the charging piles. The charging piles are then transferred to governments when the concession expires. To encourage charging pile operators to build and operate charging piles, governments usually provide two kinds of subsidies, namely construction and operating subsidies.Design/methodology/approachThe authors establish a typical game model to study the optimal BOT contract between a government and a charging pile operator and their preferences for the two kinds of subsidies.FindingsFirst, the authors show that there are substitution and complementarity effects between the concession period and the subsidy level. Second, the operator prefers the construction subsidy (operating subsidy) when the additional operating cost is low (high). The government prefers the operating subsidy (construction subsidy) when consumer sensitivity to the number of charging piles is low (high) and the concession period is short or long (moderate). Finally, the adjusted joint subsidy can not only improve social welfare but also that the charging pile operator can obtain the same profit as under the operating subsidy at a lower subsidy amount.Originality/valueThis work develops the first analytical model to study two subsidies in the construction and operation of charging piles and investigate the optimal BOT contract and subsidy preferences. The insights are compelling not only for the charging pile operator but also for policymakers in practice from a circular economy perspective.

Achieving carbon neutrality with smart supply chain management: a CE imperative for the petroleum industry

“…Recently, developed nations such as USA, UK and Japan have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 (Lee et al ., 2023). On the one hand, governments are taking action to achieve carbon neutrality by innovating the production process (Ding et al. , 2023).…”

“…Recently, developed nations such as USA, UK and Japan have pledged to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 (Lee et al, 2023). On the one hand, governments are taking action to achieve carbon neutrality by innovating the production process (Ding et al, 2023). On the other hand, waste treatment and remanufacturing are being explored to offset environmental problems and optimize resource loops (Varjani et al, 2021).…”