2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of group propagation on rumor spreading in mobile social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting finding is that when the initial emotion of s is negative and neutral, more individuals tend to be positive, while when the initial emotion of s is positive, more individuals tend to be immune. Finally, the convergence time of the large-scale network contagion process is long, and its final stabilization effect is relatively poor 37 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting finding is that when the initial emotion of s is negative and neutral, more individuals tend to be positive, while when the initial emotion of s is positive, more individuals tend to be immune. Finally, the convergence time of the large-scale network contagion process is long, and its final stabilization effect is relatively poor 37 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al [19] find that positive energy information would have a great contribution to society when information bombing takes place. Sahafizadeh and Tork Ladani [20] extend the SIR information propagation model and conclude that rumor-spreading behavior in these networks do not make a significant difference if there is rumor propagation in groups. Fibich [21] believes that a smallworlds structure has a negligible effect on the diffusion based on Bass-SIR model.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using the SIR convention, individuals who adopt this disinformation and react to it directly by consuming more power can be classified as “Infected.” Alternatively, users who are not influenced by this disinformation, for any reason, can be classified as “Removed.” And users who have not received notification yet can be classified as “Susceptible.” This classification of categories allows us to model, quantify, and predict their power usage during disinformation dissemination. There is a rich literature that formulates the phenomenon of transition between categorical labels with SIR models that employ a system of differential equations based on mean field theory or agent-based models that allow us to simulate the transmission of disinformation among autonomous agents in a flexible microscale manner 19 – 21 .…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%