2018 12th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icspcs.2018.8631785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of H.264 Non-Desynchronizing Bits on Visual Quality and its Application to Robust Video Decoding

Abstract: In this paper, the concept of non-desynchronizing bits (NDBs) is defined in the context of H.264 video as a bit whose inversion does not cause desynchronization at the bitstream level or change the number of decoded macroblocks. We established that, on the whole, NDBs make up about a third (about 30%) of a bitstream, and that their flipping effect on visual quality is mostly insignificant. In most cases (90%), the PSNR value obtained when modifying an NDB is very close to the intact value. The performance of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed scheme can help protect video content both against unauthorized access and transmission errors while maintaining the video quality similar to that of the original video. Table 5 is a PNSR-based quantitative comparison of the proposed scheme with: stateof-the-art error correction by STBMA [67]; frame copy concealment by JM (JM-FC) [68]; and other recently proposed approaches [69]. Detailed results (see Table 5 column 6) show that the proposed scheme outperformed other techniques over all test videos.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheme can help protect video content both against unauthorized access and transmission errors while maintaining the video quality similar to that of the original video. Table 5 is a PNSR-based quantitative comparison of the proposed scheme with: stateof-the-art error correction by STBMA [67]; frame copy concealment by JM (JM-FC) [68]; and other recently proposed approaches [69]. Detailed results (see Table 5 column 6) show that the proposed scheme outperformed other techniques over all test videos.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An error correction method may correct the packet if a single candidate is returned by Algorithm 1 or if one of them passes additional validations such as a UDP or TCP checksum [25], [26]. The proposed single error correction approach differs from the state-of-the-art lookup table approaches as it considers the whole set of possible syndromes that can occur, regardless of the packet length.…”
Section: A Single Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the H.264 Baseline, which uses context-adaptive variable-length coding (CAVLC), an average of 3.40 candidates per corrupted packet can be decoded. In fact, with CAVLC, the bitstream contains a significant part of non-desynchronizing bits (NDBs) [19], which are bits that can be flipped without causing the decoder to crash. These bits represent about 30% of an H.264 Baseline encoded packet.…”
Section: B Impact Of the Video Codecmentioning
confidence: 99%