2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of health expenditure on the number of chronic diseases

Abstract: We investigate the impact of health expenditure on health outcomes on a large sample of Europeans aged above 50 on individual and country level data. We find a significant negative impact on changes in the number of chronic diseases which varies according to age, health styles, gender, income and education subgroups. Our findings indicate potentially heterogeneous support to health expenditure across interest groups and are robust when we instrument health expenditure with parliament political composition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, it is to be expected that if a person with greater social participation has a lower risk of suffering from multiple chronic diseases, this would be associated with low health care utilization [ 23 24 ]. As previously claimed by Becchetti et al [ 25 ], the identification of the different factors, as well as their heterogeneous impact across different population groups is decisive when tackling the challenge of improving health outcomes without threatening the sustainability of health care systems. Therefore, along with the traditional risk factors associated with lifestyles [ 26 ], “the newest” risks linked to isolation should be taken into consideration [ 27 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, it is to be expected that if a person with greater social participation has a lower risk of suffering from multiple chronic diseases, this would be associated with low health care utilization [ 23 24 ]. As previously claimed by Becchetti et al [ 25 ], the identification of the different factors, as well as their heterogeneous impact across different population groups is decisive when tackling the challenge of improving health outcomes without threatening the sustainability of health care systems. Therefore, along with the traditional risk factors associated with lifestyles [ 26 ], “the newest” risks linked to isolation should be taken into consideration [ 27 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is by no means shut of studies on the nexus between the environment, PHE, and health status. Recent studies that have examined this link include (Akinlo & Sulola, ; Becchetti, Conzo, & Salustri, ; Dhrifi, , ; Gomis‐Porqueras, Moslehi, & Suen, ; Jaba, Balan, & Robu, ; Kato, Mugarura, Kaberuka, Matovu, & Yawe, ; Li, Fujiura, Magaña, & Parish, ; Liang & Tussing, ; Linden & Ray, ; Nicholas, Edward, & Bernardin, ; Rahman, Khanam, & Rahman, ; van den Heuvel & Olaroiu, ; Ventelou & Abu‐Zaineh, ). Edeme et al () investigated the effect of PHE and urbanization on two different health status indicators in Nigeria from 1981 to 2014.…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of corruption on healthcare outcomes may be particularly detrimental for individuals living in low-income countries, for a number of interconnected reasons. First, low-GDP per capita is generally associated with low public healthcare expenditure, which has been shown to be correlated with poor health outcomes (Becchetti et al 2017). At the same time, professionals operating in lowexpenditure healthcare systems generally earn relatively low salaries, especially when the healthcare system is financed through general taxation (European Commission 2013).…”
Section: Heterogeneity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that our morbidity indicator (i.e. the number of chronic diseases) represents a much better proxy for the healthcare quality in high-income countries, where mortality indicators tend to be similar and chronic diseases are becoming more widespread (Seo et al 2017;Becchetti et al 2017). Third, differently from most of the existing literature, our dataset makes it possible to observe the variability of selected morbidity indicators at individual level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%