The impact of health insurance status on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND In 2006, it was estimated that 47 million people in the United States are without insurance. Studies have shown that patients who are uninsured or are insured by Medicaid are more likely to present with more advanced cancer. The objective of this study was to examine whether cancer recurrence and mortality of patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are associated with insurance status, after adjusting for known cancer risk factors. The main outcome measures were overall survival and relapse-free survival. METHODS Retrospective cohort of patients with a biopsy-proven primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx diagnosed or treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 1998 and 2007. Patients were stratified by their insurance status, including private insurance, uninsured/Medicaid, Medicare disability (Medicare under age 65), and Medicare 65 years +. Covariates included age, gender, race, smoking status, alcohol consumption, anatomic tumor site, treatment, stage at diagnosis, and occupational prestige score. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of insurance status on overall survival, relapse-free survival, tumor stage, and lymph node involvement. RESULTS A total of 1231 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with Medicaid/uninsured (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.11) and Medicare disability (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.16-2.48) had significantly lower overall survival compared with patients with private insurance; the result was independent of variables known to affect outcome, such as alcohol and tobacco use. For all squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) cancer sites, Medicaid and uninsured patients were significantly more likely to present with an advanced stage tumor at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.94; 95% CI, 1.72-5.01) and to present with at least 1 positive lymph node (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.16-2.90) compared with patients with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS Patients with Medicaid/uninsured and Medicare disability were at increased risk of death after a diagnosis of SCCHN when compared with patients with private insurance, after adjustment for age, gender, race, smoking, alcohol use, site, socioeconomic status, treatment, and cancer stage.

Oral cancer public policies: is there any evidence of impact?

“…Mass-media approaches and oral cancer secondary preven-tion should be targeted to those at most risk of oral cancer. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] These individuals are described as very unlikely to become regular dental attendees.…”

“…Researchers claim their results to be statistically adjusted for age, gender, race, smoking, alcohol use, site, socioeconomic status, treatment, and cancer stage. 8 Oral-related quality of life is being frequently reported as a major concern for patients diagnosed and treated for mouth malignant neoplasms. Some studies strongly suggest that oral-related quality of life should be adopted as a standard criterion in hospital settings for the evaluation of oral cancer patients.…”

Responses of diploid and triploid Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas to Vibrio infection in relation to their reproductive status

“…Similar results were obtained using the more classical PHREG procedure (data not shown). This type of analysis has rarely been used on aquatic animals, although it is widely applied in medical statistics as it provides the hazard ratio -or the risk of death -assessment, according to treatment and prognostic variables (Arriagada et al, 2009;Kwok et al, 2010).…”

Functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: surgery and reconstruction with free flaps versus primary radiochemotherapy

“…Another great advantage of the ICF is the application of the comprehensive bio-psychosocial model, that integrates not only aspects of anatomy and (patho-) physiology (called body structures and body functions in the ICF), but also individual aspects of daily life and contextual environmental factors. These aspects are independent from tumor location, histology, and staging, but substantially inXuence the success of cancer treatment, rehabilitation, and the return to daily life [19]. In order to tailor treatment decisions to the patients' needs, it is crucial to understand the full spectrum of aspects that inXuence functional outcome.…”