2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1606-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of hip fracture on mortality in Estonia: a retrospective population-based cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundEstimates of hip fracture mortality in Eastern Europe are scarce. We aimed to estimate the magnitude and duration of excess mortality after hip fracture in Estonia.MethodsRetrospective, population-based 10-year study of persons aged ≥50 in two cohorts: with hip fracture and an age- and sex-matched (in a 1:4 ratio) random sample from the national health insurance fund database for comparison. Cumulative risks, excess risks and relative risks of death were estimated using Poisson regression with 95% bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently the excess sex-related differences in survival following hip fracture surgery follow a similar trends of the sex-related difference in survival of the general population. That men have a higher risk of dying after hip fracture is well known from the literature, and was shown also in an recent study [ 19 ]. It can be debated if this is induced by sex as an isolated variable, or if being male is a surrogate variable for comorbidity, unhealthy lifestyle or other confounders adding to their risk of both hip fracture and death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently the excess sex-related differences in survival following hip fracture surgery follow a similar trends of the sex-related difference in survival of the general population. That men have a higher risk of dying after hip fracture is well known from the literature, and was shown also in an recent study [ 19 ]. It can be debated if this is induced by sex as an isolated variable, or if being male is a surrogate variable for comorbidity, unhealthy lifestyle or other confounders adding to their risk of both hip fracture and death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Earlier papers have related the long-term mortality among hip fracture patients to the mortality rates in the general population [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 19 ]. These studies highlighted an increased mortality among hip fracture patients compared with the general population using age and sex standardization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative risk of death was sinking with temporal distance to the trauma, being highest in the first year, which has been also approved in literature [4,11,12]. Studies consistently report age-related drops in the relative mortality risk of both hip and vertebral fractures with residual increased risk for the oldest patients [12,18,23]. This has also been shown for humeral fractures and wrist fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The absolute mortality rose with every age group after vertebral and hip fractures almost proportionally. The literature can confirm this trend [4,12,21,23] and it seems easy to understand that survival rate decreases with age. That is why it is more interesting that upper extremity fractureassociated death rates seemed to stay quite stable among the age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Short-term and long-term mortality rates of hip fracture patients are common outcome measurements used as quality indicators to evaluate hip fracture care [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Reported one-year mortality incidence varies among different nationalities and other individual factors, ranging from 18.56% to 31% [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Identifying potentially modifiable prognostic factors associated with increased risk of mortality may help guide physicians, patients, and their families to taking appropriate actions to reduce the risk of mortality for individual patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%