Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America 2005
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511813580.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Imprisonment on the Desistance Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hostility, a psychological variable that can be theoretically linked to reoffending, is affected by incarceration. This is important because desistance from crime is frequently preceded by attitudinal, cognitive, and motivational changes on the part of the offender (e.g., Maruna, 2001;Maruna & Toch, 2005;Shover, 1996;Steffensmeier & Ulmer, 2005;Tibbetts & Gibson, 2002;Walters, 1990Walters, , 2003. In fact, McCord (1994) surmised that attitudinal change was the precondition to an offender's successful attachment to conventional work and family roles-two staples for predicting offending in the criminological literature (Laub & Sampson, 2003;Sampson & Laub, 1993, 1995.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hostility, a psychological variable that can be theoretically linked to reoffending, is affected by incarceration. This is important because desistance from crime is frequently preceded by attitudinal, cognitive, and motivational changes on the part of the offender (e.g., Maruna, 2001;Maruna & Toch, 2005;Shover, 1996;Steffensmeier & Ulmer, 2005;Tibbetts & Gibson, 2002;Walters, 1990Walters, , 2003. In fact, McCord (1994) surmised that attitudinal change was the precondition to an offender's successful attachment to conventional work and family roles-two staples for predicting offending in the criminological literature (Laub & Sampson, 2003;Sampson & Laub, 1993, 1995.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processes that serve to reintegrate offenders back into society generally pertain to conventional involvement in social institutions, such as family, school, work, and various social service and civic organizations. By and large, offenders who successfully attach to these institutions and initiate a stake in conformity are more likely to desist from crime than offenders who do not (Clear, Waring, & Scully, 2005;DeLisi, 2005;Laub & Sampson, 2003;Maruna & Toch, 2005;Petersilia, 2005;Sampson & Laub, 1993).…”
Section: Social Support Hostility and Prisoner Reentrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have hypothesized a strong association between nature of the imprisonment experience, institutional conduct, and post-release outcomes (Maruna & Toch, 2005;Visher & Travis, 2003). In the current analysis, institutional behavior represents the number of misconduct violations, for any offense, sustained between entrance to prison and release.…”
Section: Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, social bonds increase social capital, which makes possible the achievement of certain ends that would not have been previously available (Coleman, 1988). Thus, investment in social bonds, particularly bonds that are characterized by commitment and mutual obligations, gives one "something to lose" (Maruna and Toch, 2005), which further limits the chances that an individual will become involved with deviant behavior or sustain a criminal career. Conversely, individuals with fewer ties to society will have more barriers to successful reentry, which makes recidivism more likely.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%