The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance^*

Abstract

Despite the growing recognition of industrial design's value in creating sustainable competitive advantage, few studies have attempted to quantify the contribution that design makes to company financial performance. This article examines the relationship between industrial design and company financial performance in order to assess industrial design's contribution to this performance. Effective industrial design was evaluated by asking a panel of 138 industrial design experts to rank the industrial design effectiveness of publicly traded firms within nine selected manufacturing industries; the ranking process yielded 93 firms. Based on the rankings, firms within each industry were divided into two groups: those judged as exhibiting high design effectiveness versus those judged as low in design effectiveness. Audited financial data reported to the SEC across a seven-year period from 1995 to 2001 were used to evaluate financial performance.Using traditional financial ratios senior managers consider essential performance measures, those firms with high design effectiveness were hypothesized to have higher returns on sales, returns on assets, and growth rates of sales, net income, and cash flow than firms with low design effectiveness. High design effectiveness firms further were hypothesized to have higher stock market returns. These comprehensive, corporate financial measures incorporate expenditures made on industrial design (industrial designers' salaries, design consultants' fees, computer-aided industrial design equipment) and expenditures that designers influence through their design choices (material costs, manufacturing equipment).This analysis reveals that firms rated as having ''good'' design were stronger on all measures except growth rate measures. These results provide strong evidence that good industrial design is related to corporate financial performance and stock market performance even after considering expenditures on industrial design. Further, the patterns of financial performance over the seven-year horizon suggest that these effects are persistent.

Design, consumption and marketing: outcomes, process, philosophy and future directions

“…Candi, 2016;Gemser & Leenders, 2001;Hertenstein, Platt, & Veryzer, 2005;Roy & Potter, 1993). Research on the relationship between design and outcomes has, however, struggled with defining or operationalising design in a way that is representative of its outcomes.…”

Technology-Based New Service Idea Generation for Smart Spaces: Application of 5G Mobile Communication Technology

“…On the other hand, related literature regarding the technology-based design is reviewed in another perspective of technology-driven approach [28,[45][46][47]. Technology-based design is the most valuable for sustaining economic growth owing to the cumulative nature of technological progress.…”

“…Similarly, the role of design was addressed when developing technology-based services by investigating cases undertaken in new firms [28]. In the technology-based service development, design processes are concerned with providing a bridge from technical functionalities to value in a finished product or service and contribute to enhancing the value of services [46,47]. Evidence on the role of design in exploiting technology innovations to create attractive services and to facilitate the management of positive relationships with customers was discovered in the firms studied.…”

The Effect of the Merging of Design Disciplines and its Implication for Product Design Education

“…The importance of design at the early stage of innovation is now recognised with designers involved in scientific research. Design is rapidly evolving: it is not simply a tacit and unmanaged process, but a complex approach to innovation that combines both aesthetic and technological innovation (Hertenstein et al 2005).…”