2004
DOI: 10.1362/0267257041838782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Integration Mechanisms on Marketing/HR Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, existing research mostly focuses on collaborations between neighboring functions, e.g. between marketing and other customer-or internal resource-related departments, such as the interaction of marketing with sales (Gosselin & Bauwen, 2006), manufacturing (Alegre & Chiva, 2004), sales, communication and product development (Möller & Rajala, 1999), administration, production and R&D (Ford & Saren, 2001;Kahn & Mentzer, 1998;Souder & Moenaert, 2007), human resource management (Chimhanzi, 2004), or finance (Srivastava, Shervani, & Fahey, 1998). However, while the importance of interactions between 'boundary-spanning functions' such as purchasing on the one hand, and marketing on the other, has been advocated (Piercy, 2009), there does not exist enough empirical research analyzing the specific interplay between these two crucial departments.…”
Section: The Nature and Consequences Of Interfunctional Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, existing research mostly focuses on collaborations between neighboring functions, e.g. between marketing and other customer-or internal resource-related departments, such as the interaction of marketing with sales (Gosselin & Bauwen, 2006), manufacturing (Alegre & Chiva, 2004), sales, communication and product development (Möller & Rajala, 1999), administration, production and R&D (Ford & Saren, 2001;Kahn & Mentzer, 1998;Souder & Moenaert, 2007), human resource management (Chimhanzi, 2004), or finance (Srivastava, Shervani, & Fahey, 1998). However, while the importance of interactions between 'boundary-spanning functions' such as purchasing on the one hand, and marketing on the other, has been advocated (Piercy, 2009), there does not exist enough empirical research analyzing the specific interplay between these two crucial departments.…”
Section: The Nature and Consequences Of Interfunctional Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All organizational introverted definition of customers evidenced by a know-it-all stance about the need of its customers, the presumption in this instance, is that the organization knows what customer knows, and what customer wants and try its best to satisfy them (Chimhanzi, 2004).…”
Section: Customer Orientation and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Developing power downward, especially to front-line staff that deals with customers at critical moment (Chimhanzi, 2004). 6.…”
Section: Customer Orientation and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dewsnap & Jobber, 2000;Kotler et al, 2006;Rouzies et al, 2005), this is the first empirical test of this issue. Our study therefore responds to Chimhanzi (2004), who called for further research into the effects of reward systems on interdepartmental integration. Our second contribution is that we examine the role of senior managers' support for sales/marketing coordination in reducing inter-functional conflict and improving collaboration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%