2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1548-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Interfirm Labor Mobility on Innovation: Evidence from Job Search Portal Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kambourov and Manovskii (2004) have shown that the accumulated skills of industry or occupation-specific human capital may be destroyed upon occupational switches. However, previous papers have also found evidence of a positive impact of labour mobility on innovative activity (Kaiser et al, 2011) and firm-to-firm knowledge spillovers (Maliranta et al, 2008;Masso et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kambourov and Manovskii (2004) have shown that the accumulated skills of industry or occupation-specific human capital may be destroyed upon occupational switches. However, previous papers have also found evidence of a positive impact of labour mobility on innovative activity (Kaiser et al, 2011) and firm-to-firm knowledge spillovers (Maliranta et al, 2008;Masso et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Occupational mobility could be understood as the transfer mechanism which shifts the industry or occupation-specific human capital between economic sectors (Song et al, 2003;Masso et al, 2012) and supports innovation in firms (Kaiser et al, 2011), but according to Kambourov and Manovskii (2004) could also lead to knowledge loss. Therefore, occupational mobility could act as the facilitator or as the hinderer of structural change over the business cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the case of France, both in terms of sectors and firms, higher levels of innovation are able to reverse the destruction of jobs and even create new jobs than those who do not innovate (Greenan and Guellec, 2000). For Estonia, this phenomenon would determine a positive relationship between mobility and innovation, since successful innovation would result in more hires (Masso et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%