2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of knowledge management processes on information systems: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
1
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
73
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to improve the reporting quality of a systematic review is the use of checklists, because they provide substantial transparency in the selection process of papers in a systematic review (Al-Emran et al, 2018). Nowadays, the most widely used set of guidelines to perform a systematic review of the literature is PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, by Moher et al (2009).…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysis Of Microfinance Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to improve the reporting quality of a systematic review is the use of checklists, because they provide substantial transparency in the selection process of papers in a systematic review (Al-Emran et al, 2018). Nowadays, the most widely used set of guidelines to perform a systematic review of the literature is PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, by Moher et al (2009).…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysis Of Microfinance Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], a general characteristic of ontology is given, but the ways of implementing such a knowledge model within specific intelligent systems are not sufficiently shown. The work [14] generally describes the process of knowledge management in information systems, but does not provide tools for its program implementation. In [15], the ontology structure is considered, however, it applies to a relational database, which is a significant limitation.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Según (Al-Emran et al, 2018), el conocimiento es el activo más importante de cualquier organización; por lo tanto, tiene que ser gestionado de manera eficiente. La gestión del conocimiento (GC) se ha convertido en una predominante tendencia de investigación en el sector académico y empresarial.…”
Section: Gestión De Conocimiento (Gc)unclassified