2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of knowledge stickiness on knowledge transfer implementation, internalization, and satisfaction for multinational corporations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of knowledge sharing is largely dependent on the extent to which the recipients are satisfied with the usefulness and the relevance of the knowledge being shared (Li & Hsieh, 2009). Structural dimension of social capital is concerned with the interactions among members and the frequency with which they share information/knowledge (Akhavan & Hosseini, 2016).…”
Section: Social Capital and Knowledge Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of knowledge sharing is largely dependent on the extent to which the recipients are satisfied with the usefulness and the relevance of the knowledge being shared (Li & Hsieh, 2009). Structural dimension of social capital is concerned with the interactions among members and the frequency with which they share information/knowledge (Akhavan & Hosseini, 2016).…”
Section: Social Capital and Knowledge Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, data were acquired from semi-structured interviews with GMs and practitioners as primary sources. Four specialists and peers were consulted to authenticate the data collection tool (the interview guide) and suggested slight modifications to the innovative tool, which was grounded in the research conducted by Kogut and Zander (1995), Berlo (1960), Li and Hsieh (2009), and Pemberton and Stonehouse (2000).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the relevant work has been done on the stickiness of knowledge transfer in transnational corporations (Li and Hsieh 2009) but the results are also relevant to HE, where similar limitations exist to the circumstances that can be controlled by the parties. The friction of physical, linguistic and cultural distance are less now in the era of knowledge globalization but the context-specific nature of tacit knowledge means that careful targeting is still required (Ambos and Ambos 2009).…”
Section: Evaluation and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%