2019
DOI: 10.1177/1467358419826397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of leader–member exchange on lodging employees’ dynamic capacities: The mediating role of job satisfaction

Abstract: Firms take precautions with their dynamic capacities in response to rapidly changing and volatile conditions. Leader–member exchange refers to the importance of supervisors’ role in shaping employees’ work attitudes and job satisfaction. Previous researches on the relation between leader–member exchange and dynamic capabilities obtained mixed results; a call has been made for an examination of dynamic capabilities of lodging firms from the perspective of leader–member exchange. This research predicts that lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also confirmed a partial mediating impact of job satisfaction on the effect of role conflict on employee intention to leave. The results on the mediating role of job satisfaction have also confirmed the empirical findings of previous research studies conducted in the hospitality literature (e.g., Chan & Ao, 2019;DiPietro et al, 2019;Eşitti & Kasap, 2019;Ohunakin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Results also confirmed a partial mediating impact of job satisfaction on the effect of role conflict on employee intention to leave. The results on the mediating role of job satisfaction have also confirmed the empirical findings of previous research studies conducted in the hospitality literature (e.g., Chan & Ao, 2019;DiPietro et al, 2019;Eşitti & Kasap, 2019;Ohunakin et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Compared with other factors influencing employees' attitude and performance, such as leadership support (Eşitti & Kasap, 2020; Nasution, 2017; Ohunakin et al, 2019; Podsakoff et al, 1990; Tepper, 2000), the work itself (e.g., environment and work conditions; Carvalho et al, 2016; Gogonea & Zaharia, 2016; Grobelna, 2019), pay and benefits (Jung & Yoon, 2015), workplace relationships (Lee et al, 2015; Sun & Sun, 2015), and promotional opportunities (Leong & Lam, 2016), there have been relatively fewer empirical studies on training and mentorship's role in employees' job satisfaction and task performance. This may be due to the irregular practice of mentoring and training activities and suggests an important research gap to be addressed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred instrument used to measure emotional intelligence, emotional labor and job satisfaction in this study was a questionnaire. The constructs used in this research have been mainly studied using quantitative methods, using instruments whose reliability and validity have been attested to in previous research (Acosta-Prado and Zárate-Torres, 2019; Eşitti and Kasap, 2020; Khairy, 2020; Lee and Madera, 2019; Li et al., 2018; Pacheco et al., 2019; Viseu et al., 2020; Wang, 2019), so this tool was considered as the best for reaching the goals of the study in an effective manner. Moreover, the questionnaire method enables the gathering of a larger amount of data, using already validated survey scales and ensuring the anonymity of respondents (which is of particular importance when researching job-related issues, when employees may not feel comfortable providing honest answers).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%