The Impact of Leadership and Team Behavior on Standard of Care Delivered During Human Patient Simulation: A Pilot Study for Undergraduate Medical Students

Carlson, James E.; Min, Elana A.; Bridges, Diane

doi:10.1080/10401330802573910

Cited by 29 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies (5%) applied the assessment tool to standardized videos with actors playing all members of the HCA team and thus did not include trainees or learners as study participants. 67,68,109,110 Of the 83 included studies, 29 (35%) assessed leadership at the individual level, whereas 53 (64%) assessed it at the team level (see Supplemental Digital Tables 2 and 3 at http://links.lww. com/ACADMED/A295 for a list of the leadership behaviors or styles assessed, by tool).…”

Section: Assessment Tool Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Tools Used to Assess Team Leadership in Health Care Action Teams

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Assessment Tool Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Tools Used to Assess Team Leadership in Health Care Action Teams

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The effect sizes calculated are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. They range from very high (r¼0.77) 42 to small (r¼20.02). 48 Only one study reported a small effect, 48 while all the others described effects considered as large or medium.…”

Section: Effects Of Team Processes On Performance In the Non-intervenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Team Processes Really Have an Effect on Clinical Performance? A Systematic Literature Review

Schmutz

Manser

2013

Survey of Anesthesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Editor's key points † This review has examined the impact of team process behaviours on clinical performance. † Twenty-eight studies, which reported at least one relationship between team process or an intervention and outcome, were reviewed. † Team process behaviours have been shown to influence performance. † Training in team behaviours results in improved performance.Summary. There is a growing literature on the relationship between team processes and clinical performance. The purpose of this review is to summarize these articles and examine the impact of team process behaviours on clinical performance. We conducted a literature search in five major databases. Inclusion criteria were: English peer-reviewed papers published between January 2001 and May 2012, which showed or tried to show (i) a statistical relationship of a team process variable and clinical performance or (ii) an improvement of a performance variable through a team process intervention. Study quality was assessed using predefined quality indicators. For every study, we calculated the relevant effect sizes. We included 28 studies in the review, seven of which were intervention studies. Every study reported at least one significant relationship between team processes or an intervention and performance. Also, some non-significant effects were reported. Most of the reported effect sizes were large or medium. The study quality ranged from medium to high. The studies are highly diverse regarding the specific team process behaviours investigated and also regarding the methods used. However, they suggest that team process behaviours do influence clinical performance and that training results in increased performance. Future research should rely on existing theoretical frameworks, valid, and reliable methods to assess processes such as teamwork or coordination and focus on the development of adequate tools to assess process performance, linking them with outcomes in the clinical setting.

show abstract

“…The American College of Surgeons recommends integration of simulation as a means to enhance patient safety, reduce medical errors, and evaluate various competencies. Previous studies support the use of curriculum-based simulation with computerized mannequins, live animals, and/or cadavers to hone individual decision-making, leadership, and communication skills as well as improve team performance during critical care scenarios [24][25][26][27]. Human patient simulators can be employed as an evaluation tool to objectively assess resident performance and knowledge related to critical care [20,28,29].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nonoperative Management of Solid Organ Injury Diminishes Surgical Resident Operative Experience: Is It Time for Simulation Training?

Bittner

Hawkins

Medeiros

et al. 2010

Journal of Surgical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Impact of Leadership and Team Behavior on Standard of Care Delivered During Human Patient Simulation: A Pilot Study for Undergraduate Medical Students

Abstract: The methods used provide a possible method for training and assessing team performance during simulation.

Cited by 29 publications

References 27 publications

A Systematic Review of Tools Used to Assess Team Leadership in Health Care Action Teams

A Systematic Review of Tools Used to Assess Team Leadership in Health Care Action Teams

Do Team Processes Really Have an Effect on Clinical Performance? A Systematic Literature Review

Nonoperative Management of Solid Organ Injury Diminishes Surgical Resident Operative Experience: Is It Time for Simulation Training?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About