The impact of left ventricular reconstruction on survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

O’Neill, James; Starling, Randall C.; McCarthy, Patrick M.; Albert, Nancy M.; Lytle, Bruce W.; Navia, José L.; Young, James B.; Smedira, Nicholas G.

doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.07.018

Cited by 46 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The overall 5-year survival was 68.6 %, and 78 % of patients were not readmitted to the hospital for congestive heart failure [ 10 ]. Excellent results have been reported from SVR procedures at the Cleveland Clinic as well, with that series showing 30-day mortality of 1 %, and survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92 %, 90 %, and 80 % respectively [ 11 ]. While this registry and case series data appeared encouraging for the technical feasibility, safety, and initial effi cacy of surgery for ventricular restoration, they all suffered from the limitations of their non-randomized study design.…”

Section: Surgical Ventricular Remodeling: Cardiac Function and Survivalmentioning

confidence: 53%

Percutaneous Treatment of Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling

Zahr

Horwitz

2016

Catheter Based Valve and Aortic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Surgical Ventricular Remodeling: Cardiac Function and Survivalmentioning

confidence: 53%

Percutaneous Treatment of Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling

Zahr

Horwitz

2016

Catheter Based Valve and Aortic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The plication at the inferolateral portion of the ventricle is useful to lift up the new apex. [29]. The authors published data obtained from 220 consecutive patients who underwent SVR.…”

Section: Svr Cardiac Function and Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical Ventricular Restoration to Reverse Left Ventricular Remodeling

Castelvecchio¹,

Menicanti²,

Donato³

2009

CCR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heart failure is one of the major health care issues in the Western world. An increasing number of patients are affected, leading to a high rate of hospitalization and high costs. Even with administration of the best available medical treatment, mortality remains high. The increase in left ventricular volume after a myocardial infarction is a component of the remodeling process. Surgical Ventricular Restoration (SVR) has been introduced as an optional therapeutic strategy to reduce left ventricular volume and restore heart geometry. So far, it has been established that SVR improves cardiac function, clinical status, and survival in patients with ischemic, dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Since its first description , SVR has been refined in an effort to standardize the procedure and to optimize the results. This review will discuss the rationale behind surgical reversal of LV remodeling, the SVR technique, its impact on cardiac function and survival, and future expectations.

show abstract

“…For ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients with adilated ventricle (LVESVI >100 ml/m 2 ), arecent study from O'Neil and colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic emphasises that SVR is clearly the most important component of the3V's (18). Twohundred and twenty heart failurep atients underwent SVR of which 80% had concomitant CAbg and 49% mitral valve repair.…”

Section: The Role Of Surgeryinischaemic Cardiomyopathymentioning

confidence: 99%