2020
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1803405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of linguistic bias upon speech-language pathologists’ attitudes towards non-standard dialects of English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…James (2013) have already discussed it more than a decade ago. Within the last five years, Manjavacas et al (2019) and Clark et al (2021) has covered it. In the context of teaching Indonesian for speakers of other languages, Alifiani & Mujianto (2023) have mentioned the issue in their works.…”
Section: Preferred Learning Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…James (2013) have already discussed it more than a decade ago. Within the last five years, Manjavacas et al (2019) and Clark et al (2021) has covered it. In the context of teaching Indonesian for speakers of other languages, Alifiani & Mujianto (2023) have mentioned the issue in their works.…”
Section: Preferred Learning Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a social symptom, language and language use are not only determined by linguistic factors [27], [28] but also by non-linguistic factors, including social and situational factors. With the existence of social and situational factors that influence the use of language [29], then language variations arise.…”
Section: Language Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to learning goals, students ‘need to optimize their own speech and voice in light of the future profession’, and their speech should become ‘free of any regional language or accents’ (Study program of the authors’ institution, author's translation). SLTs’ focus on perfect language and speech—or at least a normative stance towards language and speech—has resulted in discussions on SLTs’ biased assessment of dialectical varieties during language diagnostics (e.g., Clark et al., 2021; Easton & Verdon, 2021; Oetting et al, 2016; Patterson, 1994; Wolfram, 1992) and in studies on suboptimal speech patterns in preservice SLTs (D'haeseleer et al, 2016). In a study on the language proficiency of Flemish SLT students, the authors wrote: ‘In the master programs of SLTs in Flanders, the use of the standard language remains the norm’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%