2022
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of loneliness on compliance with COVID‐19 prevention guidelines

Abstract: Many individuals have been reluctant to follow the COVID‐19 prevention guidelines (e.g., wearing a mask, physical distancing, and vigilant handwashing) set forth by the U.S. Center for Disease Control to reduce the spread of COVID‐19. In this research, we use reciprocal altruism theory to investigate the role of loneliness and its impact on compliance with these guidelines. Our findings indicate that lonely individuals are less willing to comply with COVID‐19 prevention guidelines than non‐lonely individuals. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adherence was higher for people whose interaction value did not change by adhering. Interacting with physical distancing and mask-wearing could produce psychological states of discomfort, lack of connection, or loneliness that difficult adherence, as Schultz and Newman (2022) found. This phenomenon probably occurred in the late months of quarantine when isolation increased the value of interacting while breaking the norms, as Shawler and Blair (2021) suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adherence was higher for people whose interaction value did not change by adhering. Interacting with physical distancing and mask-wearing could produce psychological states of discomfort, lack of connection, or loneliness that difficult adherence, as Schultz and Newman (2022) found. This phenomenon probably occurred in the late months of quarantine when isolation increased the value of interacting while breaking the norms, as Shawler and Blair (2021) suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These situations could increase the value of social interaction as reinforcers and facilitate risky behavior, as Shawler and Blair (2021) suggested. Schultz and Newman (2022) found that individuals who felt lonely were less willing to comply with protective behaviors than those who did not. For people, adhering to the norms was probably tricky because adherence represented a loss in the quality or quantity of social interactions, and they felt it was not the same (negative punishment).…”
Section: Social Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Loneliness emerged as a prevalent mental health issue during the Covid-19 pandemic (Groarke et al, 2020;Killgore et al, 2020;Li & Wang, 2020). Schultz & Newman (2023) contend that the implementation of social distancing severed interpersonal connections, leading individuals to become more self-focused. Consequently, the diminished sense of responsibility stemming from loneliness contributed to the perception that compliance with social restriction policies was not beneficial (Schultz & Newman, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schultz & Newman (2023) contend that the implementation of social distancing severed interpersonal connections, leading individuals to become more self-focused. Consequently, the diminished sense of responsibility stemming from loneliness contributed to the perception that compliance with social restriction policies was not beneficial (Schultz & Newman, 2023). This suggests that loneliness may act as a catalyst for individual non-compliance, driven by the desire for social interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation