2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of mean reversion model on portfolio investment strategies: Empirical evidence from emerging markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why we choose these seven stock markets is that all these stock markets have been set up earlier than 1990 and a long sample period renders the results of our test more convincing. Akarim and Sevim (2013)has ever suggested that a mean reversion model is valid in the long run. Indonesia is excluded because it fails in the pre-test of LM Fourier unit root test below.…”
Section: Data and Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason why we choose these seven stock markets is that all these stock markets have been set up earlier than 1990 and a long sample period renders the results of our test more convincing. Akarim and Sevim (2013)has ever suggested that a mean reversion model is valid in the long run. Indonesia is excluded because it fails in the pre-test of LM Fourier unit root test below.…”
Section: Data and Summary Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If stock prices are mean reversion processes, then stocks are less risky for longer investment horizons so that more wealth may be allocated to stocks to get more returns. Finally, mean reversion in stock prices means a contrarian strategy, which consists of buying past losers or selling past winners (De Bondt & Thaler, 1985), is able to generate excess returns (Akarim & Sevim, 2013).…”
Section: Stationary Test With a Nonlinear Fourier Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Bondt & Thaler, 1985Richards, 1997;Balvers, Wu, & Gilliland, 2000, Chou, Chung, & Wei, 2007Akarim & Sevim, 2013), a negative return autocorrelation (e.g. Fama & French, 1988, Bali, Demirtas, & Levy, 2008Mukherji, 2011) and a cointegration relationship between the stock prices and their fundamental value (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using annual data of 18 international stock market indexes covering the period 1969-1996, they found a mean reversion justified by a significant reversal rate of 18.2% and 20.2% when the benchmark index is respectively the world and the stock index of the U.S. Recently, Akarim and Sevim (2013) replicated the methodology of Balvers et al (2000) to test the validity of the hypothesis of mean reversion of 18 emerging markets for the period 1995-2010. They found that this hypothesis is valid and that the speed of mean reversion varies between 30 and 38 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%