2002
DOI: 10.1177/088740302237804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Media on Knowledge and Perceptions of Megan’s Law

Abstract: Using survey data, this research examines the role of media exposure and attention to media on people's knowledge and perception of a specific criminal justice policy: Megan's Law. Overall, the results revealed that general knowledge of Megan's Law is low. Media exposure and attention increased the level of specific knowledge of Massachusetts community notification law but did not have an effect on knowledge of Megan's Law in general. Attention to crime in the newspaper was related to both support for Megan's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most citizens are familiar with Megan's Law and support the policy as an important public safety measure (Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, & Baker, 2007;Proctor, Badzinski, & Johnson, 2002). The majority of 193 individuals surveyed in Florida indicated that they believe that most sex offenders will reoffend and therefore community residents should be told about all sex offenders living amongst them .…”
Section: Public Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most citizens are familiar with Megan's Law and support the policy as an important public safety measure (Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, & Baker, 2007;Proctor, Badzinski, & Johnson, 2002). The majority of 193 individuals surveyed in Florida indicated that they believe that most sex offenders will reoffend and therefore community residents should be told about all sex offenders living amongst them .…”
Section: Public Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although community notification laws appear to have broad public support (see Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, & Baker, 2007;Phillips, 1998;Proctor, Badzinski, & Johnson, 2002), they have not been without detractors. Early opposition centered on the emotional origins of the law, the practical difficulties of implementation, the lack of empirical support, and constitutional issues, particularly the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment (see Avrahamian, 1998;Bell, 1996;Bolding, 1997;Freeman-Longo, 1996;Hughes, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other research has also shown high public support for adult registry and community notification laws (Caputo & Brodsky, 2004;Proctor, Badzinski, & Johnson, 2002;Redlich, 2001). It is important, however, to test politicians' and policy-makers' assumption that such support extends to juvenile sex offenders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%