Filmless Radiology 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1402-1_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Medical-Legal Issues in Strategic Planning for PACS and Teleradiology Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital imaging technologies have acquired sufficient reliability and cost-effectiveness to convince imaging providers to shift from film-based to filmless departments. It has allowed widespread use of teleradiology (17) with the potential to improve healthcare access, delivery and standards, but can also raise complex new legal and ethical issues (18). These include image retention and fraud, privacy, malpractice liability, licensing and credentialing, and contracts for PACS and tele-radiology.…”
Section: Teleradiology and Filmless Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digital imaging technologies have acquired sufficient reliability and cost-effectiveness to convince imaging providers to shift from film-based to filmless departments. It has allowed widespread use of teleradiology (17) with the potential to improve healthcare access, delivery and standards, but can also raise complex new legal and ethical issues (18). These include image retention and fraud, privacy, malpractice liability, licensing and credentialing, and contracts for PACS and tele-radiology.…”
Section: Teleradiology and Filmless Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposal for security in tele-radiology based on legal considerations has been published in Germany (22). Teleradiology, in contrast to 'local environment radiology' , may not allow adequate exposure of the distant interpreter to important clinical findings, unless new practice standards require sizeable images and data transfer (17). Failure of a local radiologist to seek second "electronic" opinion may be a malpractice offence and plaintiffs may challenge the local diagnosis after 'shopping for a tele-radiologist's opinion' .…”
Section: Teleradiology and Filmless Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%