From Stress to Wellbeing Volume 2 2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137309341_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on People at Work: Existing Research and Issues

Abstract: Despite the attention mergers and acquisition have received from financial and marketing strategists, the merger failure rate remains as high as ever. In light of the current wave of merger activity, it would seem an appropriate time to consider alternative explanations of merger failure, and assess the contribution which psychology can make to our understanding of mergers and acquisitions in addressing the essence of the activity; the positive combination of people and the fusion of organizational cultures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
31
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an insight is, to the best of our knowledge, missing from extant M&A research. Whilst the human side of M&A has received a wealth of scholarly attention since the 1980s, both as regards domestic (Buono & Bowditch, 1989;Cartwright & Cooper, 1990;Napier, 1989) and cross-border (Froese et al, 2007) transactions, the question as to whether the employee experience in cross-border transactions is different from that in domestic transactions remains open to debate (Teerikangas, 2012). Our findings enable us to contribute to this debate by observing that instead of the expected difficulty of the cross-border M&A experience, the domestic merger experience ought not be treated as a domestic one, as it is equally affected by the international.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an insight is, to the best of our knowledge, missing from extant M&A research. Whilst the human side of M&A has received a wealth of scholarly attention since the 1980s, both as regards domestic (Buono & Bowditch, 1989;Cartwright & Cooper, 1990;Napier, 1989) and cross-border (Froese et al, 2007) transactions, the question as to whether the employee experience in cross-border transactions is different from that in domestic transactions remains open to debate (Teerikangas, 2012). Our findings enable us to contribute to this debate by observing that instead of the expected difficulty of the cross-border M&A experience, the domestic merger experience ought not be treated as a domestic one, as it is equally affected by the international.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main focus in this line of work has been on the negative emotional experience, i.e. the anxiety and stress that major organizational upheavals such as mergers create in the involved organizations' employee bases (Cartwright & Cooper, 1990;Kiefer, 2002;Weber & Fried, 2011b). Less attention has been placed on the positive employee reactions incurred (Teerikangas, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, then, mergers often fail to meet the strategists' initial objectives. Perceptions of the relative power of the merging organizations and their key representatives affect a variety of reactions among employees ranging from compliance to questioning and resistance (Cartwright and Cooper, 1990;Maguire and Phillips, 2008).…”
Section: Structural Changes and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the people issues is acknowledged as an essential task when staffs from different organisations are brought together (Cartwright & Cooper, 1990;Hunt, 1987). For those staff required to report to management in a different organisation, the impact of collaboration is likely to be as acute as for a merger scenario.…”
Section: Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%