During visual exploration, saccadic eye movements scan the scene for objects of interest. During attempted fixation, the eyes are relatively still but often produce microsaccades. Saccadic rates during exploration are higher than those of microsaccades during fixation, reinforcing the classic view that exploration and fixation are two distinct oculomotor behaviors. An alternative model is that fixation and exploration are not dichotomous, but are instead two extremes of a functional continuum. Here, we measured the eye movements of human observers as they either fixed their gaze on a small spot or scanned natural scenes of varying sizes. As scene size diminished, so did saccade rates, until they were continuous with microsaccadic rates during fixation. Other saccadic properties varied as function of image size as well, forming a continuum with microsaccadic parameters during fixation. This saccadic continuum extended to nonrestrictive, ecological viewing conditions that allowed all types of saccades and fixation positions. Eye movement simulations moreover showed that a single model of oculomotor behavior can explain the saccadic continuum from exploration to fixation, for images of all sizes. These findings challenge the view that exploration and fixation are dichotomous, suggesting instead that visual fixation is functionally equivalent to visual exploration on a spatially focused scale.free-viewing | fixational eye movements | miniature eye movements | fixational saccades | natural images C lassic and current vision studies distinguish between visual exploration, characterized by the alternation of saccades and brief fixation periods, and attempted visual fixation, where subjects maintain relative gaze stability despite continuous but minute fixational eye movements (i.e., microsaccades, slow drift, and oculomotor tremor) (1-7). The theoretical separation between exploratory gaze shifts and attempted fixation dates back to the discovery of fixational eye movements in the early 1900s (2-4), and remains central to contemporary discourse in visual, cognitive, and oculomotor research (8). However, mounting evidence in support of a common generator for both exploratory saccades and fixational microsaccades (refs. 9-12 but see ref. 13) brings into question whether such a dichotomy is justified. Instead, it may be that saccades and microsaccades form an oculomotor continuum along the entire spectrum of exploratory scales, with classical exploratory saccades at one end and classical fixational microsaccades at the other end. In that case, it might be baseless to distinguish between fixational and exploratory behaviors. Recent studies have identified abnormal dynamics of saccades and microsaccades as potential diagnostic markers of neurological disease (14-16); thus, the frame of reference proposed here may have important clinical implications concerning the role of the affected brain centers in the patients' oculomotor behavior.To establish such a framework, one must first reconcile any known discrepancy between the ...