2021
DOI: 10.1080/19376812.2021.1883076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of migratory practices on food security and asset accumulation in Zimbabwe: a study

Abstract: Debates about the capacity of migratory remittances to enhance food security abound. This article examines the impact of remittances in shaping agricultural production and asset accumulation patterns in Zimbabwe. Using empirical evidence drawn from a sample of 1,090 households and anchored in a political economy conceptual framework, we posit that remittances do not automatically stimulate food security and asset accumulation. Massive deteriorating conditions of work and the growing economic crisis under conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remitting also initially increases and then declines with increasing length of time since first migration (Makina & Masenge, 2015). Zimbabwean households sending migrants are heavily dependent on remittances from abroad (Bracking & Sachikonye, 2010; Maphosa, 2007; Mazwi, 2022; Muzapu & Havadi, 2021; Ncube & Gomez, 2015; Nyikahadzoi et al, 2019; Nzima et al, 2017). Remittances are spent predominantly on livelihood needs such as housing, food purchase, medical treatment, transportation, clothing, and children’s education.…”
Section: Pre-covid Migration and Remittancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remitting also initially increases and then declines with increasing length of time since first migration (Makina & Masenge, 2015). Zimbabwean households sending migrants are heavily dependent on remittances from abroad (Bracking & Sachikonye, 2010; Maphosa, 2007; Mazwi, 2022; Muzapu & Havadi, 2021; Ncube & Gomez, 2015; Nyikahadzoi et al, 2019; Nzima et al, 2017). Remittances are spent predominantly on livelihood needs such as housing, food purchase, medical treatment, transportation, clothing, and children’s education.…”
Section: Pre-covid Migration and Remittancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, A2 farmers are also heterogeneous, as some also face challenges in accessing credit facilities and produce far less than others . As they are less favoured by government policy, accessing only the presidential input scheme which supports the production of maize, and more recently as availed through the Pfumvudza programme, smallholders in the A1 and CA models are less endowed with productive assets and tend to rely on personal savings, remittances and the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of agricultural produce (Shonhe and Mtapuri, 2020;Mazwi, 2021). The reliance on precarious sources of funding by smallholder farmers and the production of crops that are less common on the commodity markets increases their vulnerability and reduces the scope for their resilience.…”
Section: Politics Access Climate Change Resilience and Smart Croppingmentioning
confidence: 99%