The impact of motivational interviewing on adherence and symptom severity in adolescents and young adults with chronic illness: A systematic review

Schaefer, Megan R.; Kavookjian, Jan

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.037

Cited by 58 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…33,34 In the present study, AYAs reported that they learned from bleeding events and did not mention using reminders. Motivational interviewing is a patient-centered communication technique 33 that has shown promising results in 11 out of 12 studies in AYAs with asthma, diabetes and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). For example, the adherence levels of AYAs with asthma increased from 32% to 62% after using MI.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

“…Most interventions were focused on reminders, 30 interactive smartphone apps, 30,31,32 text messaging 30,31 and motivational interviewing (MI). 33 Two reviews on implementing reminders or interactive applications showed only short-term effects. 33,34 In the present study, AYAs reported that they learned from bleeding events and did not mention using reminders.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…33 Two reviews on implementing reminders or interactive applications showed only short-term effects. 33,34 In the present study, AYAs reported that they learned from bleeding events and did not mention using reminders. Motivational interviewing is a patient-centered communication technique 33 that has shown promising results in 11 out of 12 studies in AYAs with asthma, diabetes and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

<p>The Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults on Adherence to Prophylaxis in Hemophilia: A Qualitative Study</p>

Hoefnagels¹,

Kars²,

Fischer³

et al. 2020

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with severe hemophilia use prophylaxis that requires a high level of adherence. The present study aimed to explore the underlying reason for adherence and non-adherence to prophylaxis in hemophilia from the perspective of AYAs. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study in Dutch AYAs with hemophilia (14-25 years) using prophylaxis was executed. Focus group interviews and individual interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded and analyzed using an iterative process. Member checking in three respondents was used to validate the potential model. Results: A total of 21 interviews were performed. Parental support decreased when AYAs gained more treatment responsibilities, which resulted in a higher risk for non-adherence. AYAs were weighing their potential bleeding risk per activity based on the wish to do what they prefer while also wanting to simultaneously feel safe. When bleeding with low impact on their daily life occurred, or when bleeding remained absent, AYAs felt safe and the perceived need for prophylaxis decreased. Conclusion: The level of treatment responsibility per AYA and estimated risks per activity were the two main underlying reasons for (non-)adherence. Clinical implications: We suggest using a conversation technique to discuss adherence, especially during bleeding assessment visits.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

<p>The Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults on Adherence to Prophylaxis in Hemophilia: A Qualitative Study</p>

Hoefnagels¹,

Kars²,

Fischer³

et al. 2020

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In weighing the pros and cons of such proposed treatment, both medical arguments and the patient's personal views and preferences should be taken into account [3,37]. Providing information in manageable chunks, only at the patient's request, or after obtaining the patient's consent to provide it, helps in enhancing the patient's motivation to listen to and process the education provided [51][52][53].…”

Section: How Can We Move From Doctor-centred To Patientcentred Consulmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Shared creation of an agreed course of action can help to ensure that the treatment proposed aligns with the patient's views and preferences [45,46], and increases the likelihood of the patient following through with the treatment plan. This can be further supported by asking the patient for their explicit agreement with the treatment plan, and with their confidence in being able to follow it [53].…”

Section: How Can We Move From Doctor-centred To Patientcentred Consulmentioning

confidence: 99%

Education makes people take their medication: myth or maxim?

Driever

Brand

2020

Breathe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cite as: Driever EM, Brand PLP. Education makes people take their medication: myth or maxim? Breathe 2020; 16: 190338. @ERSpublications Education on its own doesn't make people take their treatment as intended. However, when it follows shared decision making, in which patient and doctor together agree on the best course of therapeutic action, education helps patients take their treatment. http://bit.ly/2G2XswD

show abstract

Endocrine Care During Adolescence into Young Adulthood

Gleeson¹

2019

Brook's Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impact of motivational interviewing on adherence and symptom severity in adolescents and young adults with chronic illness: A systematic review

Cited by 58 publications

References 31 publications

<p>The Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults on Adherence to Prophylaxis in Hemophilia: A Qualitative Study</p>

<p>The Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults on Adherence to Prophylaxis in Hemophilia: A Qualitative Study</p>

Education makes people take their medication: myth or maxim?

Endocrine Care During Adolescence into Young Adulthood

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About