2001
DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.1.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of NAFTA on the United States

Abstract: We describe the main economic arguments posed for and against the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) during the U.S. policy debate. To evaluate these arguments, we analyze recent trade data and survey post-NAFTA studies. We find that both the U.S. and Mexico benefit from NAFTA, with much larger relative benefits for Mexico. NAFTA also has had little effect on the U.S. labor market. These results confirm the consensus opinion of economists at the time of the debate. Finally, studies find that trade cre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For tractability most CGE models impose relatively simple and stringent assumptions such as constant returns to scale production and appear to underestimate the impact of trade agreements ex post (Burfisher, Robinson, andThierfelder 2001, Robinson andThierfelder 2002). One response to this "search for large numbers" has been to supplement CGE analyses with econometrically estimated gravity models that tend to generate larger estimated effects of trade agreements, though have the disadvantage of generating results only for trade volumes, and not economic efficiency or welfare per se.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Of Ftaapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tractability most CGE models impose relatively simple and stringent assumptions such as constant returns to scale production and appear to underestimate the impact of trade agreements ex post (Burfisher, Robinson, andThierfelder 2001, Robinson andThierfelder 2002). One response to this "search for large numbers" has been to supplement CGE analyses with econometrically estimated gravity models that tend to generate larger estimated effects of trade agreements, though have the disadvantage of generating results only for trade volumes, and not economic efficiency or welfare per se.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Of Ftaapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…James and Umemoto present a model of ROO, but they do not implement this model in their empirical analysis of changes in trade shares. Burfisher, Robinson, and Thierfelder (2001) provide a useful survey of the impact of NAFTA on the United States that covers both macroeconomic issues and structural adjustments. They point out the fallacies in much of the macroeconomic discussion related to NAFTA involving the effects on U.S. labor markets, the balance of trade, aggregate employment effects, and the effects of the peso crisis.…”
Section: Nafta In Context and A Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burfisher et al (2001) surveyed extensively the impact of NAFTA in several topics as the labour market migration, the Peso crisis, agriculture, automotive industry, textiles, among others.…”
Section: The Nafta In the Context Of Cge Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%