2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2046349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Impact of New Zealand’s Statutory-Backed Continuous Disclosure Regime on Corporate Disclosure Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the continuous disclosure regulatory regime was more effective in the post-2000 period. The increased incidence of bad news forecasts post the increased regulation is consistent with the results of Dunstan et al (2006). However, they also found a significant increase in good news forecasts after the adoption of continuous disclosure in New Zealand.…”
Section: Management Earnings Forecastssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests that the continuous disclosure regulatory regime was more effective in the post-2000 period. The increased incidence of bad news forecasts post the increased regulation is consistent with the results of Dunstan et al (2006). However, they also found a significant increase in good news forecasts after the adoption of continuous disclosure in New Zealand.…”
Section: Management Earnings Forecastssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…to significantly increase the level of non-routine earnings forecast disclosure by Australian listed companies after 1 January 2000 Dunstan et al (2006). find a significant increase in non-routine management earnings forecast disclosure following the adoption of continuous disclosure in New Zealand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior earnings forecast theories and empirical research studies have largely focused on explaining firms' decision to issue earnings forecasts to pre-empt any expected change in earnings (Hirst, Koonce, and Venkataraman, 2008). Some of these studies have considered the difference between earnings forecasts that are routine and those are non-routine in nature in an attempt to refine this explanation (Chan, Faff, Ho, and Ramsay, 2007;Dunstan, Gallery, and Truong, 2008). In contrast to the trend of research investigating why firms decide to forecast earnings, our study seeks to examine how firms manage their earnings forecast strategy once they have decided to release earnings forecasts.…”
Section: How Do Firms Manage Their Earnings Forecast Strategy? a New ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research shows that U.S. managers are more likely to issue the full content of bad news in one announcement relative to good news due to the strong culture of private litigation (Skinner, 1994;Kasznik and Lev, 1995;Soffer, Thiagarajan, and Walther, 2000;Baginski, Hassell, and Kimbrough, 2002). In contrast, such asymmetrical treatment between good news and bad news is not observed in other lower litigation risk environments such as Japan, Canada, and New Zealand (Baginski et al, 2002;Kato, Skinner, and Kunimura, 2006;Dunstan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Earnings Forecast Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%