2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of operational strategies on the performance of a photo-EBPR system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where VSS (g m −2 ) represents the biomass of the suspended carriers, and V (m 3 m −2 ) denotes the biofilm volume on the surface area of the carriers (Alves et al, 2002;Shi et al, 2015). The specific denitrification rates were determined in accordance with the method described by Carvalho et al (2018). DO and pH were monitored using a portable multi-parameter meter (WTW 3430, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where VSS (g m −2 ) represents the biomass of the suspended carriers, and V (m 3 m −2 ) denotes the biofilm volume on the surface area of the carriers (Alves et al, 2002;Shi et al, 2015). The specific denitrification rates were determined in accordance with the method described by Carvalho et al (2018). DO and pH were monitored using a portable multi-parameter meter (WTW 3430, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific denitrification rates were determined in accordance with the method described by Carvalho et al . (2018). DO and pH were monitored using a portable multi‐parameter meter (WTW 3430, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of lines indicates the number of processes within a given category (e.g., biological processes or biological nitrogen processes), and the size of points indicates the number of processes within a given process group (e.g., microbial fuel cell). A full list of processes, as well as classification into process groups and by core attributes, is included in Table S3-1. ...…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, higher nutrient recovery can be achieved when compared with anaerobic technologies in WWTPs [9,10], and the good settling properties of the microalgal-bacterial flocs reduce the biomass harvesting costs associated with microalgal systems [11,12]. Recently, a photo-enhanced biological phosphorus removal (photo-EBPR) system composed of a consortium of microalgae and bacteria demonstrated a good capacity for P removal at a low chemical oxygen demand (COD) to P ratio (COD/P) and without external aeration requirements [13]. The photo-EBPR system was operated with dark-light cycles, simulating conventional anaerobic-aerobic EBPR cycles, resulting in a culture enriched with polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) and microalgae [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a photo-enhanced biological phosphorus removal (photo-EBPR) system composed of a consortium of microalgae and bacteria demonstrated a good capacity for P removal at a low chemical oxygen demand (COD) to P ratio (COD/P) and without external aeration requirements [13]. The photo-EBPR system was operated with dark-light cycles, simulating conventional anaerobic-aerobic EBPR cycles, resulting in a culture enriched with polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) and microalgae [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%