2002
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties

Abstract: BACKGROUND The evaluation of organized mammographic service screening programs is a major challenge in public health. In particular, there is a need to evaluate the effect of the screening program on the mortality of breast carcinoma, uncontaminated in the screening epoch by mortality from 1) cases diagnosed in the prescreening period and 2) cases diagnosed among unscreened women (i.e., nonattenders) after the initiation of organized screening. METHODS In the current study, the authors ascertained breast carci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
220
1
12

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
220
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Decreases in breast cancer mortality have been variously reported following the introduction of mammographic screening on a regional level (Tornberg et al, 1994;Quinn and Allen, 1995;Garne et al, 1997;Barchielli and Paci, 2001;Broeders et al, 2001;Tabar et al, 2001;Duffy et al, 2002). Randomised prospective trials indicate that benefits in terms of cumulative breast cancer mortality start to emerge 4 -10 years after randomisation (Nyström et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreases in breast cancer mortality have been variously reported following the introduction of mammographic screening on a regional level (Tornberg et al, 1994;Quinn and Allen, 1995;Garne et al, 1997;Barchielli and Paci, 2001;Broeders et al, 2001;Tabar et al, 2001;Duffy et al, 2002). Randomised prospective trials indicate that benefits in terms of cumulative breast cancer mortality start to emerge 4 -10 years after randomisation (Nyström et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammographic screening, which is an x-ray examination, is one option for an early detection of potential breast malignancies and consequently, for the commencement of treatment (Vainio & Bianchini, 2002; Wilson & Jungner, 1968). The pros and cons of screening for breast cancer have been debated; negative effects, such as the risk of unnecessary treatment due to over-diagnosis (Jørgensen, Keen, & Gøtzsche, 2011; Løberg, Lousdal, Bretthauer, & Kalager, 2015), have been mentioned, while a mortality reduction has been a counter argument (Duffy et al, 2002; Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening, 2012). However, the organized population-based mammographic screening programme is perceived as effective, and the majority of the countries in the European Union (except three) implemented it in 2016 (Ponti et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] There are, however, also drawbacks connected with screening such as anxiousness among women who are recalled and population radiation load. Another drawback is the effect of lead time, which for several individuals causes an increased time to live with a diagnosis of breast cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%